%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:57:41-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:40-04:00
2021-07-02T15:57:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0457.a1
uuid:d386d66d-9d0b-47a3-9b14-e873421dd27c
uuid:3d01b885-6a30-4b4d-9a55-47efe1be10d5
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0457.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0457.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(December 8, 1997)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 96-0457)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.609 -2.125 Td
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.958 -2.125 Td
(Bill C. Giallourakis, Esq.)Tj
-19.101 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Ap\
ril 11, 1997, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was denied a meaningful opportunity to be)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(represented by counsel during the proceeding below; and \(2\) whether th\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's decision is arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued a Statement o\
f Reasons \(SOR\) dated October 18, 1996 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion K \(Security Violations\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(A hearing was held on February 13, 1997. )Tj
17.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a decision in which she)Tj
-17.107 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether Applicant was denied a meaningful opportunity to be represented \
by counsel during the proceeding below)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 129 cm
0 0 m
553.494 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 581.4941 129.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-47.125 -1.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant argues: \(a\) prior to the hearing, a Department of\
Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(DoD\) employee misinformed him about)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the nature of the hearing's formality and implied that Applicant did not\
need to retain counsel; \(b\) at the hearing, the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge made a statement that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(implied indifference to Applicant's right to retain counsel; )Tj
41.224 0 Td
(\(c\) the)Tj
-41.224 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge should have postponed the hearing to allow Applican\
t more time to prepare and to consider)Tj
T*
(retaining counsel; \(d\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge failed to make a finding on the record that App\
licant was competent to)Tj
T*
(proceed without an attorney; and \(e\) although the Directive and two ot\
her documents Applicant received)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(prior to the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(We'@I kSl$)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDR&P,i?',
)T`GhqwU'eBYWTUW㿨V%1|^ꣿ4*t7>l2Q[(%TNNZ|gzѥ\b}k˸_4fN|t\)S4tm^HUT6cC%X0vyPYóYT)9/[;+o[{/zxY⎖Ye"kZ:[8[:[8[Y99999wXߡc}Ǻ
-v~Dq!c*/.mV>+ ZC
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxÛxDFh3fW#qc(AQFH<@FQ>fDu&3ۣfH}炙 x!"}Ѵyѽ*_LrtJq^O5uP
o?e~0m'?6 GԎ@!_~*O?m=ߧCSӺ^]Ϛ'
~5X.Vi)s xC7N1,_2xX3]q)~
K$%j C//[U[ _5e0~ AJD-tFt:EYzD/"X6Vq"VfӫOM_?ZԭWA`b0C6j~5mA5e>['۴mç;ggw/{|ճWobb'H"mߍ1?L8irV9ӦϘ9kܹ/@ޢK.[by5ku7lܴymwܵ{O}P#G/?qTN9{|bZy
ZLPTB1f,uFHR4EZ"kr