%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:58:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:08-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:08-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0575.a1
uuid:f4a67224-59c5-4f9b-b166-123f662d918b
uuid:b0db0eb4-4f27-4a92-a326-cd9ad3fe11f9
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0575.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0575.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:58:08 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(July 22, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
65.004 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0575)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 243.8945 468.75 Tm
(Michael H. Leonard, Esq.)Tj
1.041 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 250.8789 392.25 Tm
(Charles M. Shaw, Esq.)Tj
-19.573 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated March 18, 19\
97, in which he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. Applicant appealed. For the)Tj
T*
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(admitting various)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(documents into evidence over Applicant's objections; and \(2\) whether t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's adverse security)Tj
T*
(clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated August)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(13, 1996 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion G \(Alcohol Consumption\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on December 16, 1996. The Administrative Judge later \
issued a written)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision in which he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by admitting various documents in\
to evidence over)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's objections)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 79.5 cm
0 0 m
551.016 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 579.0156 80.25 Tm
(.)Tj
-46.918 -1.125 Td
(At the hearing, Applicant objected to the admission of Government)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Exhibits 4 through 11 on various grounds. On)Tj
T*
(appeal, Applicant contends the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge erred by admitting Government Exhibits 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 into\
)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(evidence over his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(objections. The Board will discuss the challenged exhibits by category.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(JAʁ|S.)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\]k0+e{QIZas69v!r< '!IRVϕ&H`j
8`.xf`;3{I,q¾r 89NaՓ.[:wWY!o`n,G/mzd)T6wӼ5+>g--˘qWys|
\viwD4ۅc9cΈw;=X2K|$.K%s$Jʕ+)W"7jgE>}(vPAbE9hvA,MY4eiҔ9+67jn!#]rtMXE` 9ʮ
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p "xÛxDF4Y]#F%"(ITTooDOfu\Gl#~ɐN%,V!##NY@aVdC_W u }!m
~H¸Yc**6:"Q|PGPzplbs>Yy.1blRL'aES>[HQ`>wFF'i
n<B4 C//ۈU[)1_5e#;@&zt6@<*9ѕ茴th6Z?O=j(DxmFE8%:W-oھu֫ߠah
VCiҴٻҢeZyж>aҾCN?o>?g?E}~ٯ5p|3$vh\|BI#FJfOv⤔SӦH9kv/XhX"kevΪk֮3߰q97oKmwܵ{}P9UNb";'oWtyܷ<\6vo$Z<{Fy,"ׁ>#.:F;3xez-/1߽l: ^N. Ϻ47N 論=t
l M@xgEN$'FJ<*l)"_#Bqqgpbp(A1.x f CD$`1#o o9H$q[OC<^ʤE!$Î*ZLKh)-C5Ĥ#=VPl!7r'U/ZZGfZOh#m͔Kyi+m)fIh7!/E{iy&_ďTh? K t1GԀq*FԘ(NP!~oۤdtNStS*b*tJ;ԄR3]iG(\'O)>E|9>\VkZYhȒeedwك/E.|5ela+r#|=~6~t5Nedj|u̟8ss!p0;T\ZZkglk7}DuZXj-RA@IQYߙN/y8ZtNѩ:Mt6qkge\/r%_=_xw֫ѻ5y^\u.tNԯzг~Kzz^zYD\/+J*F51zQ7zKtLl,r2r^oz@wzH{^gOs'sNTNtLlᶜy%X}{ao}_ep Cp(8G(cp,pN'qN)e\s1w܉'3wq.ER\qUZSn.
szSi.|G#AStn9Nsǩqj:ipF4;cB(HPuX NG$B$CHTHtȈܘWd;.@[ȅ<ȇ(vPd.sWg,|&~ :@G@Wo<Gx
_xkĻ#
ŔA=4@#܃&h !D6 )d{|Dv=cR[@9X5x!'ɩ|Q$_U|]ΌVxr\,1;[-"^n[vS_3y FyT<+e,ȫJVZ([PZSJVi*Ce,ڪ'Iy)w.8Ejq#F]*Wz
8i0~_sϩt.EkѺh}!hLiXp7Mr6nꦹnfnu|-ta>Q>\UWIw_ wsJ/Ii . "% %t"XDZDCUTV\Y$RRa)f@pgw|s_ݹ3s~}ٺkݳ[(Bb Z9p
6Pd@&F
vSER)z>P{q).K)b518NwPjKmR{z:_)#K=L]+u$JN='TM}Q@iJD1@D_яFhCci}J3&DD
MFh:͠tʠ4fK猧ї4Wb_c<_m-lkefQnM{*<*~jD_-
\N+i5h
6Q6mZim5o[v{XBli~]ʡta:Btqʣ|:ATHETL%TJ'3TFTATEtV5P
lHgLW* F2¸4nda<Va,ǎ8W*\ip3ڪjfW*PPA
V!ڥJR*E0ZiѵtmmZ5\Tц1uL]yӼeihƦZEHUQzk!&0!s19f