%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:58:23-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:22-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:23-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0609.a1
uuid:f6f0b84f-cb62-4029-83ce-ea1082f8e41b
uuid:74e4d435-5c1d-406e-8b17-0443c2bf6059
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0609.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0609.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:58:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(July 22, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
65.004 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(DOHA Case No. 96-0609)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 237.7246 468.75 Tm
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter)Tj
0.319 -2.125 Td
(Chief Department Counsel)Tj
1.512 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated April 15, 199\
7, in which he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. Applicant appealed that)Tj
T*
(adverse decision. For the reasons set forth)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's Decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's conclusions were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(arbitrary, capricious or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Reasons \(SOR\) dated August)Tj
T*
(30, 1996. The SOR was predicated upon Criterion H \(Drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Involvement\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\) and Criterion)Tj
T*
(J \(Criminal Conduct\). Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(submitted a response to the SOR in which he requested a hearing. A heari\
ng was held)Tj
T*
(on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(February 6, 1997. The Administrative Judge issued an unfavorable decisio\
n on April 15, 1997.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(The case is before the)Tj
T*
(Board on appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(Applicant does not contest any of the Administrative Judge's specific fi\
ndings of fact. He does)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(contest the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's formal findings and, implicitly, his conclusions.\
We construe)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his appeal as asserting that the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's conclusions were arbitrary, capricious or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant notes that his last use of marijuana was in June 1996, somethi\
ng that he informed the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(about at the hearing. Applicant asserts that he has completely overcome \
his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(problems with marijuana. While a period of)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(7&*j;\n)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpd&G|+LS)s^c@ǂ@tد z
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
sg.Plh1FKbL@DDň`^b:رlˌ`wc@[Yܽ9s
P `tfCΰx8^7rsŶ;P.p-fp mywQ@%].&2; ~dwGT*s?
+5Ux3|sب^q@~]G
EŭMҌ@
`OP*@T'ж4DJb0(7C|gY:oi92!
[hG3PFK*|[]bCABqsWE+^ӫd)e+_I3[~z@UVQj [/~7iq-Zj擶~y_t__u|%4,]#"uѳWLl>q}AaF22q1IcSƍ01u)SM1sl̙;o~ڂ/Yj[|J^zu7lܴyKmwܵ;c}Շ([bc[cK富zF.7WYW+!/M~~I3`1|gXC8Qr8_"DtRxe<{7S)TZ[-P-Aۢ.hW3Ts K%ђPjz!Y7BsH9dJ$F9DjjK\YKr@rhjjg.S^t6Qx1^HTnann]ܾd9+m\;\J3YYYY3j;.@βӳf KvrfQfف6֎`GCG#QQauTpx;Оkwooe?dϰﶧK}}n[97DSԾ}K\v>P+ԁ=(eHTWd`gZALcqqq`<~Y0=vs=S&gXa}#<^gHS9_*c1 q1)XO$KH#11I'#
͡4S- #yP*Ji^%-%l
ZIh5ڈW8OɔBh3mtJŨ8mT<ɋJS)JSGh7eK,`-Q9*O UK&:H^nFf:Jt :I~O:)ʢt9lJTPUm:x=o7N筼ɻx7/y^ C|Qc|OI4|ȗ2_1<6