%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:58:34-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:34-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:34-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0681.a1
uuid:08349e84-7f10-421f-b12c-04b6b72d25c1
uuid:c81f247d-42cf-4a74-be0f-24ac9467fbca
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0681.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0681.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:58:34 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(April 14, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 54.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
70.33 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0681)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.947 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 244.5537 468.75 Tm
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq.)Tj
0.986 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT2 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 290.377 392.25 Tm
(Pro se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.865 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated December 6\
, 1996, in which he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. Applicant appealed. For the)Tj
T*
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not accepting a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(document submitted after the hearing; and \(2\) whether Applicant is ent\
itled to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(have the case remanded to the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge with instructions to reopen the record to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(receive and consider the document submitted by)Tj
T*
(Applicant after the hearing, or to receive the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(testimony of the author of that document.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(September 23, 1996 to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. The SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\)\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on November 13, 1996. At the hearing, Applicant indic\
ated that he had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(hoped to be accompanied by)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(an attorney, but that the attorney was not available due to an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(emergency. After a colloquy among the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge, Applicant, and Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Counsel, Applicant indicated he would proceed without the assistance of \
the attorney)Tj
T*
(\(Hearing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Transcript at pp. 7-9\). At no time during the hearing did Applicant sta\
te or suggest that the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(attorney was)Tj
T*
(supposed to appear as a witness.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(At the hearing, Applicant offered no documents for the Administrative Ju\
dge's consideration)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Hearing Transcript at p.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(27\). After testifying on his own behalf, Applicant rested his case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(without offering any documents \(Hearing Transcript at)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(p. 72\). Nothing in the record indicates or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(suggests that Applicant asked the Judge for permission to submit any)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(:Uلj)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wI4X]ȡhHt
1}G]PA'3|3{ߝ=zW904J-b,$ɰAջiF<2$:g8|xYj4
H街S')~"_nxϓa$v=#3Z
7Z
C-,I|E(2
m65L5e)ωOed
U*-1"2⤥4Ix/68sVi|5H6`
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\؝3bcI4c" JMT(ػb;
{bSx{䬵>}][8M/+e$<x
gQ_89Qbڇ|(=(*s@
xzv7dHjW\*2?ch%{n2~[rf?a1U
!}uX