%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:58:44-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:44-04:00
2021-07-02T15:58:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96-0710.a1
uuid:7919af3b-c4cc-497c-a84d-1e952b2c7a97
uuid:bb12021f-78c8-40a6-981e-90ff6ea3ed1a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0710.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0710.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:58:44 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE:)Tj
( June 20, 1997)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 51.3262 748.5 cm
0 0 m
69.996 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 723.75 Tm
(__________________________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re:)Tj
T*
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
T*
(__________________________________________)Tj
T*
(ISCR Case No. 96-0710)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.934 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND ORDER FOR REMAND)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.641 -2.125 Td
(Appearances)Tj
-2.016 -2.125 Td
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 250.7061 493.5 cm
0 0 m
110.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 244.5537 468.75 Tm
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq.)Tj
0.986 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
0.276 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 259.7002 417 cm
0 0 m
92.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 249.2148 392.25 Tm
(James G. Smalley, Esq.)Tj
-19.435 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated January 14\
, 1997, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. Department Counsel)Tj
T*
(appealed. For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Admini\
strative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administra\
tive Judge's finding that Applicant has)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(successfully rehabilitated himself after a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(federal conviction for bank fraud is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary \
to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 27,)Tj
T*
(1996. The SOR was based on Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\). A hearing was held on November 26, 1996. The)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge subsequently issued a decision in which he conclude\
d it is clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent with the national)Tj
T*
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. The ca\
se is now before the Board on Department)Tj
T*
(Counsel's appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(from that favorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.906 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(In December 1994, Applicant was convicted for bank fraud under 18 U.S.C.\
\2471344. Applicant's criminal conviction was)Tj
T*
(based on illegal activities associated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(with real estate ventures that occurred between 1988 and April 1991.)Tj
T*
(Notwithstanding the conviction, the Administrative Judge found that Appl\
icant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(successfully mitigated and overcome the)Tj
T*
(Government's case against him under Criterion J. He based his finding on\
the following factors: \(a\) although Applicant)Tj
T*
(was not coerced to engage in illegal activities, there was "a degree of \
pressure to do so" and such pressure was no longer)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(present in Applicant's life; \(b\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's criminal conduct ended in April 1991 and has not recurred; \(\
c\) Applicant)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(L]3\nN|2@]D)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@}buQќ-mN}ϗO,4y3摜tYoBӻ=V{oBԞcn&$M_XvIjSMطIQ.xqw˺(Ib wڎ\=wݏ5nW~^ˣtXvz_mN]6OZO]Yi,Abl϶-
Se}]Ƥpxl;{e=m;댝)zƞsv9{^h>w6