%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:00:44-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:43-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0184.a1
uuid:2e1677eb-da98-441a-bf0b-8a822035982a
uuid:1fdd0ae2-16ea-4bd6-86c1-ec3fb56ff65a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0184.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0184.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:00:44 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 16, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0184)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.934 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND ORDER FOR REMAND)Tj
9.5 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.125 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.291 -2.125 Td
(Larry H. Layton, Esq.)Tj
-19.769 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Wilford H. Ross issued a decision, dated February 1\
1, 1998, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(The Board remands the case to the Administrative Judge for further proce\
ssing consistent with the rulings and)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(instructions set forth in this Decision and Order)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(for Remand.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6, dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by finding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Government Exhibit 1 was obtained under circumstances reflecting duress \
and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(disregarding it as not a credible)Tj
T*
(statement; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's favorable credibilit\
y determination of Applicant is sustainable; and)Tj
T*
(\(3\) whether the Administrative Judge's conclusions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\), dated April 7, 1997.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion D \(Sexual Behavior\), Criterion E \(Pers\
onal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Conduct\), and Criterion J \(Criminal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\). )Tj
(The SOR alleged that Applicant engaged in criminal sexual conduct in Mar\
ch 1986 and January 1996, and)Tj
T*
(falsely denied to government investigators in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(November 1987 and December 1996 that he had engaged in such criminal)Tj
T*
(sexual conduct.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on August 26, 1997. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge later issued a written decision in which he con\
cluded)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue\
a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.208 0 Td
(The case is)Tj
-41.208 -1.125 Td
(before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from that favorable deci\
sion.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding Government Exhibit 1 w\
as obtained under circumstances)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 61.5 cm
0 0 m
522.85 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 48.75 Tm
(reflecting duress and disregarding it as not a credible statement)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 48 cm
0 0 m
302.895 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 318.8945 48.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(At the hearing,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department Counsel proffered)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(k#QI\\؞)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn