%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:00:47-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:46-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:47-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0193.a1
uuid:1d54aa59-2a9c-49e9-a70d-3c4abfa4b162
uuid:316408f5-cf01-460b-b075-2ffbcbf2ad80
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0193.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0193.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:00:47 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 5, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0193)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.054 -2.125 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.832 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax issued a decision, dated September 30,\
1997, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(demonstrated a lack of integrity and good judgment required by persons s\
eeking)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(access to classified information; and)Tj
T*
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance deci\
sion is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated March 7, 1997 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on July 22, 1997. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision, dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(September 30, 1997, in which he concluded it is not clearly consistent w\
ith the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a)Tj
T*
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-13.299 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant demonstra\
ted a lack of integrity and good judgment)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 129 cm
0 0 m
565.506 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 116.25 Tm
(required by persons seeking access to classified information)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 115.5 cm
0 0 m
288.246 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 304.2461 116.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(In the decision,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge concluded)Tj
-24.021 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's criminal conduct "demonstrates a lack of integrity and good \
judgment required of anyone seeking access to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(classified information." )Tj
9.656 0 Td
(On appeal,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant challenges that conclusion, arguing: \(a\) the Judge erroneous\
ly concluded)Tj
-9.656 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant purposely withheld information about her criminal record \
from her security clearance application; and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(b\))Tj
T*
(the Judge made erroneous findings about the testimony of one of Applican\
t's witnesses. )Tj
35.284 0 Td
(The Board will address each of)Tj
-35.284 -1.125 Td
(these arguments in turn.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(peL#"Zӑ\()
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsgwATl0k
{@^)6P,Q4P,XbE]콣("(6UY}~߹瞹g|@ 44ۛϟظGE/̨ "G4TXr-@?{XT@4 Mcb+PrQ2;q&}čLxӋ'Z:bFF9 a;x0."!+|Ðh<> :b`]eãZx[3
@I\,C#T}0CPEAВFeb*e<
`8k`v+ J˾wP+MHY1A(7$UXɽgժ{רYv^1M>n
6įqh٪uڡc]v,_2$|?{Wo|}߰Ac6|FN3q?0qωILM:}Yi̝-%K-O_2c5̵ӆ6oٺmvٻoցه=xN)_x \ڮًUSF40]A-l$
4Rh:3Ub!bc&NSYb@|;+йOjNPz)>O%W)RcRj234,1d_&1U6U1U32) S)G1
jECP먾j#ƪ$5YUWm>5KUOg+]s9i16m4ۯhjdmq~Ntwvtvq\g&] (|+l"_
9̤*W̝Mb8M!':buR='ϔA RBsS&*