%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:00:46-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:45-04:00
2021-07-02T16:00:46-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0191.a1
uuid:ffb7ecce-8784-448c-992c-d933911acc66
uuid:305a27ff-9d85-4ac4-b73f-dbf170db12f3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0191.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0191.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:00:46 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 28, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0191)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.125 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.514 -2.125 Td
(Sheldon I. Cohen, Esq.)Tj
-19.545 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax issued a decision, dated October 28, 1\
997, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding Applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conduct was criminal in nature; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge e\
rred by finding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(against Applicant with respect to)Tj
T*
(subparagraphs 1.a. through 1.e. of the Statement of Reasons; \(3\) wheth\
er the Administrative Judge failed to give due)Tj
T*
(consideration to the "whole person" concept and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(pertinent mitigating factors; \(4\) whether the Administrative Judge err\
ed)Tj
T*
(by finding there was a nexus between Applicant's conduct and his securit\
y eligibility; and \(5\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adverse decision disregarded Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals prec\
edent and policy.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(In April 1991, a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) was issued to Applicant, a\
lleging, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
32.162 0 Td
(inter alia)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.694 0 Td
(, )Tj
(that he had failed to file his)Tj
-35.856 -1.125 Td
(federal income tax returns for 1985-1989 and his state income tax return\
s for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1986-1989. )Tj
35.851 0 Td
(After a hearing, an)Tj
-35.851 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated December 26, 1991,\
in which he concluded Applicant had)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(demonstrated sufficient mitigation and rehabilitation to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(warrant a favorable security clearance decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued an SOR dated April 15,\
1997 to Applicant. )Tj
38.435 0 Td
(The SOR was based on)Tj
-38.435 -1.125 Td
(Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\) and alleged Applicant willfully failed \
to file his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(federal income tax returns for 1985-)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1988, 1990-1995 and Applicant failed to file his state income tax return\
s for 1990-1995.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on September 9, 1997. )Tj
17.274 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision, dated)Tj
-17.274 -1.125 Td
(October 28, 1997. )Tj
(In that decision, the Administrative Judge found that Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(failed to timely file state income tax)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(returns for 1983-1996 and failed to timely file federal income tax retur\
ns for 1983-1996. )Tj
35.628 0 Td
(The Judge also found)Tj
-35.628 -1.125 Td
(Applicant filed his state and federal income tax)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(returns for 1983-1989 in November 1991, filed his state and federal)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(aRBP0)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\J@{6*BizQ>@Lkn6۟d3߰mF]lKjl^kۜ!z>*yLWwjfKj5un>ֻ[.'ҵzD>˧cwzgg~#ޯbS[=uGͪ=KW=ٳ4NYU x6X^Gq9y.%ؓ=9K,9DKQ̺u=ky1M/S<nB7ܓ_/^.
+^z }fF3C%%idtQzgf wQ
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTWרȦҼ55&@&$F# DDňqqC\Q\PDTwmm(.&FGgΜSnݺy߹/@ h I@uZ'#ذ0 iK&o%~yT!G4I0