%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:01:15-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:15-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:15-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0299.a1
uuid:69d25678-12f9-4e05-b025-d5bf3e889028
uuid:eb63df0b-482f-41c1-b8cd-e2f4fe93d121
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0299.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0299.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:01:15 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 11, 1997)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0299)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.609 -2.125 Td
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.902 -2.125 Td
(Francis J. Flanagan, Esq.)Tj
-19.157 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Ju\
ly 31, 1997, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether he was denied due proce\
ss and a fair hearing.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated April 21, 1997 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion G \(Alcohol Consumption\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on June 26, 1997. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
she)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.375 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 81.6836 183.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 81.6836 183 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 153.75 Tm
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings about h\
is history of alcohol abuse. )Tj
40.256 0 Td
(However,)Tj
-40.256 -1.125 Td
(Applicant contends he was denied due process and a fair hearing because:\
\(1\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge erred by)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(permitting Department Counsel to make arguments not based on facts in ev\
idence; \(2\) the Administrative Judge erred)Tj
T*
(by basing her decision on Department Counsel's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(objectionable arguments; and \(3\) the Administrative Judge's errors)Tj
T*
(precluded Applicant from having the opportunity to confront witnesses an\
d challenge the evidence against him. )Tj
44.876 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.876 -1.125 Td
(reasons that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(follow, the Board concludes Applicant's arguments lack merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Strict application of formal rules of evidence is not required in DOHA p\
roceedings. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
33.712 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional)Tj
-33.712 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item 19. )Tj
12.496 0 Td
(In addition, DOHA proceedings are civil in nature, involve)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(hearings held before an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(?TF lC\\)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\ۊ0^Մm=>MƮo3҅
|9$uslܰ=LE\'vY7cEvO,eVllD,]Wnd"SYUBtA&Qm,˺E߉Ճ|fdaй+2QLқ.2iY1+#|Bγ{⚹&fmNڜ9i-X[V"c@us朸`.٧"J3k("̌)5Gs^My5ՔWs^My5@WJ/A>gn!`s=n
/O^>+ 7O
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xǫz`<]