%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:01:23-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:22-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:23-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0324.a1
uuid:d911d833-8f1c-46f0-b7e5-3477fcdc2dd6
uuid:ff8854d3-86fb-47d5-8699-1c77aacc53a1
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0324.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0324.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:01:22 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 12, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0324)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.138 -2.125 Td
(William S. Fields, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.916 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Joseph Testan issued a decision dated November 3, 1\
997, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 2, 1997 to Applicant. )Tj
46.738 0 Td
(The)Tj
-46.738 -1.125 Td
(SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
T*
(A hearing was held on August 5, 1997. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(entered a formal finding against Applicant and concluded it was not clea\
rly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
T*
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's November 3, 1997 adverse security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge gave insufficient consi\
deration to three mitigating conditions in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's case. )Tj
6.983 0 Td
(We construe Applicant's contention as presenting the issue of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-6.983 -1.125 Td
(decision was arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The first mitigating condition that Applicant contends should have been \
applied is Drug Involvement Mitigating)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Condition #4 \("satisfactory completion of drug treatment program prescr\
ibed by a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(credentialed medical professional"\).)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
(>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE]bC5` /y(*Q4F1R,Xb,`QQ.vW1Y}|ߜ9sܹ} @<~ݦ
Иej /氉Z+vp 2#cGh`axH}Fv
nTy=@pgcDtlA<.d
#Gи4kƄFGxQ )+fX[ #cGĔv\q2}{
BOTj| CPEAP(
Uy7zk@[8zx05 %_»|h6fHu1A7v*Im_vN7h٥q\dV蛷h٪'^mڶkݡO]vSz3078_CCBaXXxD#G36f ?L7yʏS6=~ 3gNJNI3w-eeWUפX~FCfV&ڼe;vڽg:|$'豼'
O*:]|8Wu醹X݅$M-N4S
͡t^:,Pl#b8_,/]Gv=ZjsPvA`y[ΗKeT~)Wi544+5
Pm6U6S'tuut
uMt_pݵ
(R[qT(.J3CT:(J$*IeV٬T*|X9\S}~^}>R?Z?sW/0۰հ`vVgXnjL VVJDS(sG먄^3$b8W\ 9DV[[sEr{rW./7+
h"54M: `m6'Ρ=]x
_p!MIW?p(r]?pЏBl
7Zj9Y{[Ui9+ѐ7܇U#k.+jŕd]]P *K*Os_` p7.NoK{K;K[K'OKkKKKޢ|j͡ eeKKT 2g8s0ښfS?S_mjkjiҙXnoWe,0sqqè3jnrsjn7lKWkTZZZf(<
u|~}Յw^\3wxo1CZQOTggsG?"gZM}#ϳZ=_*:HcXãTXY!CJEP`.,$})lx%df8 AA8A)8pJ`+' .(!FH
c 80~Xq0&ÏL}4-g#xp .E `J\q
@W?J`Õ
WLǵF{1+xqnDfbf&܌[p+nw.x0Sq7ctx#:a= >6Cxb#G0s(k
^kxRg:άʺ1_֝`K]R7t_z Y#\z,&=ԉY$u:ENc/Y b_Q+uge? (;wg0RܥcR]#@p QꂻSm^OFIn[VMn;NK{^OMyй$<*<)OiyF$v.;W
s]"O[yyA^eyE^Օu]UWu
]Sҵu]WuP7ҍ,nVՋ>ުjjFƨp"UƩ*ZMP$5ͮ覺n[薺n~_6nvjڭjگ::nnNNy&wL</5R[N$^$>T8J8rI"&4J#Bȧ2R&Q2S*QVF)\PTL~>Q\$T
S
@
u{Aw=FtzJBE)Qq*A%2ShSERq4iMI9M)z^zީdޫ>/`b%+fX4lsZN9gLpVf윃sr.y8/MSi]p>7֍\wD7r!.EEb@`Ÿ8pKe[\Ksw]0.