%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:01:27-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:26-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:27-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0351.a1
uuid:1fc2c366-7f64-4820-9562-f77d7e24f831
uuid:9f8b52e7-d544-431f-a128-3ed62c4433f6
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0351.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0351.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:01:27 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 22, 1997)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0351)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 594 cm
0 0 m
116.666 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 147.2031 569.25 Tm
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND ORDER FOR REMAND)Tj
9.5 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.138 -2.125 Td
(William S. Fields, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.916 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Kathryn M. Braeman issued a decision, dated Septemb\
er 5, 1997, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board remands the case to the Admin\
istrative Judge for further processing)Tj
T*
(consistent with the rulings and instructions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(set forth in this Decision and Order for Remand.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 14, 1997 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\) and Criterion H \(\
Drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Involvement\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, indicating he wanted "to have \
a decision without a hearing." )Tj
41.945 0 Td
(A File of)Tj
-41.945 -1.125 Td
(Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared and a copy provided to Applicant\
. )Tj
30.602 0 Td
(After)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's response to the FORM)Tj
-30.602 -1.125 Td
(was received, the case was assigned to the Administrative Judge for dete\
rmination.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision is which she entered \
a formal finding for Applicant under Criterion)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(J, but formal findings against him under Criterion H. )Tj
21.358 0 Td
(The Judge concluded it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
-21.358 -1.125 Td
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from)Tj
-25.295 -1.125 Td
(that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Applicant challenges the Administrative Judge's adverse decision based o\
n several arguments: \(1\) he did not conceal the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(full extent of his drug abuse history; \(2\) the written statement he ga\
ve to an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(investigator was incorrect when it indicated)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(p\rN$3nT&)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsb]^P`
1K>c" E,(*Q4Q),ł.bEEņv](g6{}{9 L[}v_b