%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:01:30-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:29-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:30-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0356.a1
uuid:6a0d92e4-5433-4246-8c55-d2b8e8268df0
uuid:2706cc11-57b5-4a9e-9400-bef4432479f0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[33 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0356.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:01:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 21, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0356)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.609 -2.125 Td
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.735 -2.125 Td
(Jonathan C. Green, Esq.)Tj
-19.324 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated December 12,\
1997, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative Judge's d\
ecision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated July 1, 1997. )Tj
46.572 0 Td
(The)Tj
-46.572 -1.125 Td
(SOR was based on Criterion C \(Foreign Preference\) and alleged Applican\
t)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(planned to maintain foreign citizenship and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(planned to vote in future foreign elections.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on September 11, 1997. )Tj
17.774 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision, dated)Tj
-17.774 -1.125 Td
(December 12, 1997, in which he concluded it is not clearly consistent wi\
th the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-13.299 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 81.6836 156.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 81.6836 156 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 126.75 Tm
(Applicant raises several arguments in support of his contention that the\
Administrative Judge's decision should not be)Tj
T*
(affirmed: \(a\) the Administrative Judge's adverse credibility determina\
tion should)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not be sustained; \(b\) the Judge's)Tj
T*
(findings are not supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable min\
d might accept as adequate to support a)Tj
T*
(conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(same record; \(c\) the Judge's decision is based, in part, on conduct)Tj
T*
(neither charged in the SOR nor proven by Department Counsel; \(d\) the J\
udge failed to completely list Foreign)Tj
T*
(Preference Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Guideline 2 or acknowledge its obvious applicability to Applicant's case\
; \(e\) the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge's decision is against the manifest weight of the record evidence; \
and \(f\) the Judge's adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision is arbitrary)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(\\\)vpz.0} z)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn