%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:01:50-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:49-04:00
2021-07-02T16:01:50-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0440.a1
uuid:c6adb165-8370-4086-97fd-e5d23ae01128
uuid:61c4e10c-f98a-459b-a11d-56242fec6bc7
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[35 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0440.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0440.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:01:50 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 23, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0440)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.125 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision, dated June 12, \
1998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Stat\
ement of Reasons contained various errors; \(2\))Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(whether the Administrative Judge's findings of fact are erroneous; and \(\
3\) whether the Administrative Judge's adverse)Tj
T*
(security clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law\
.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated September 18, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\) and Criterion J \(\
Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(A hearing was held on April 14, 1998. )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision is which\
he)Tj
-15.608 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse decisio\
n.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.375 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 86.3535 156.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 86.3535 156 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 126.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Statement of Reasons contained various errors)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 126 cm
0 0 m
284.906 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 312.9062 126.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant addresses the SOR allegations, contending)Tj
-24.742 -1.125 Td
(they)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(contain or reflect various errors. )Tj
15.077 0 Td
(The Board does not review the completeness or accuracy of an SOR. )Tj
27.796 0 Td
(Rather, the)Tj
-42.874 -1.125 Td
(Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reviews the Administrative Judge's decision to determine whether it cont\
ains harmful factual or legal error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
45.749 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-45.749 -1.125 Td
(Directive,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item 32. )Tj
21.243 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board need not address Applicant's contentions)Tj
-21.243 -1.125 Td
(about the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR allegations.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant also notes the Administrative Judge characterized some of the \
SOR allegations as duplicative and adding)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(z̺gA%pГ)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
CEhJia4tH#DxqIE$eu\?CF[]ڀxީ]
mo.xPrL3F|4VxJBwWX}fBQ@}̀ĴMy?/S|.!4c'Xʷ
ϴ
w.nSoK$|"v)&c)2X^^FFgua|>0ҏ~Y~07ҿM*2K]u5\ha641{#ǭG
0 v
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\%b/hKLbAQ-Q1"XX+{/ˌ`wXw@JZwuuοA J _תW5-^8EĄYZ!@AڈqfRN}~TlϘE =
ͣ#{<1s,0Z.x)/:&n%/8h?".uqL237Yք_xLjWdPGWPf1 }~5Uvj2F2O ҋ|{NE4)P,n³vU
ySVf93Q&緥z }נʧm>%?9J),f0,7wQx ϒ^J.[|*W1hfOj5>Yv7h(qA͚Ңepm~Ͽhˎ!_N:ߥB=GdT^?vAq?2t~1rT_$7>qBRIL6}Y̝.J]d+l+W^k߰q-[mO۱3}={3?p#G?q3g3q._vǍl
I_uFRllXǾܑ(N≼+QBtTj)(x%IU)/MM}LM'L>|