%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:32-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:32-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:32-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0676.a1
uuid:c96c4206-08cf-41b5-9b51-1e6e4c91fa3c
uuid:6c1bbcc9-8ed3-44c7-bcf6-521641104c73
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0676.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0676.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:32 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 29, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0676)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.387 -2.125 Td
(Carol A. Marchant, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.165 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Kathryn M. Braeman issued a decision, dated April 6\
, 1998, in which she concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(The Board remands the case to the Administrative Judge for further proce\
ssing consistent with the rulings and)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(instructions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(set forth in this Decision and Order for Remand.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6, dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by finding that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant did not try to steal money from an employer in 1996; and \(2\)\
whether the Administrative Judge's favorable)Tj
T*
(security clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law\
.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\), dated October 14,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1997. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
24.941 0 Td
(Department Counsel later moved to amend the SOR to)Tj
-24.941 -1.125 Td
(include)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the allegations that Applicant's conduct under Criterion J also fell und\
er Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
T*
(Applicant did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not object to the motion to amend the SOR.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 11, 1998. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision, dated A\
pril 6,)Tj
-16.107 -1.125 Td
(1998, in which she concluded it is clearly consistent with the national \
interest to grant or continue a security clearance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from that fa\
vorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant did not\
try to steal money from an employer in)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 63 cm
0 0 m
543.861 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 50.25 Tm
(1996)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 49.5 cm
0 0 m
24 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 40 50.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found Applicant did not try to steal $30.00 in \
1996 from his then-employer.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(d1$o\(\()
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgw]4XCϘHb
,ł.bE"*}WQ,ϒE6{}s=s~@ 3;ϟGEL OXs@5<@@D #&ӓ\ eTxA큎!8s~|}(RULrwMbJRרYvǺN7piبqWCf[lG6myбS.]yuw^ϗ7ǡA0,8$4lx""G;n|O&N<ӦϘ9뗘s͋O`K.uVÚ'mHNٸi15-}mݖ}]ݗ@Cs=v