%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:20-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:19-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:20-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0618.a1
uuid:bfd77700-a70c-4dc0-b5e8-ab1a0fbb1ac0
uuid:81b5a5d7-1c99-4bd8-91bd-4d3358b5bd62
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0618.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0618.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 11, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0618)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued a decision, dated March 31, \
1998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated September 24, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion D \(Sexual Behavior\) and Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated he did n\
ot wish to have a hearing. )Tj
40.186 0 Td
(A File of Relevant)Tj
-40.186 -1.125 Td
(Material \(FORM\) was prepared, and a copy of the FORM was provided to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
34.492 0 Td
(Applicant did not submit a)Tj
-34.492 -1.125 Td
(response to the FORM. )Tj
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for determination\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision in which he concluded\
it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(The case is before)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Board on Applicant's appeal from)Tj
-25.295 -1.125 Td
(that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Administrative Judge found Applicant engaged in sexual misconduct wi\
th minor females in 1975 and 1993-1994,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(received military discipline in connection with the 1975 misconduct, and\
was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(convicted \(as a civilian\) in 1995 for sexual)Tj
T*
(misconduct with minor females during 1993-1994. )Tj
20.58 0 Td
(The Judge also found that, prior to appearing in court for the 1995)Tj
-20.58 -1.125 Td
(charges, Applicant volunteered to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(participate in a court-approved counseling program for sex offenders and\
was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
( AԺ)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZņk@^)Ec*ł%X{/bb˳d
}9s枹s ԃ8 ]7'&nA!Q3z7I1: p02ãGF
h
`idp}t ob@ W`7!Ǚ% ]̑BaTD>@?
v