%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:47-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:46-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:47-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0730.a1
uuid:2bb90f0c-ccb4-49e5-ad59-a998cbe735c1
uuid:61bb2ad2-c0d1-4a8a-9eac-b481b5928d2a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0730.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0730.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:46 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 21, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0730)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-5.224 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 415.5 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 390.75 Tm
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey-Anderson issued a decision, dated Jun\
e 30, 1998, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992 as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 27, 1997 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\), Criterion\
E \(Personal Conduct\), and Criterion J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(At the time that he provided an answer to the SOR, Applicant elected to \
have his case determined on a written record)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(instead of a hearing. )Tj
8.358 0 Td
(The Government submitted a File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) to the App\
licant on March 13,)Tj
-8.358 -1.125 Td
(1998. )Tj
(Applicant submitted a reply to the FORM on April 28, 1998. )Tj
27.081 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a)Tj
-27.081 -1.125 Td
(written decision, dated June 30, 1998. )Tj
15.414 0 Td
(The Judge found that Applicant had a history of financial irresponsibili\
ty. )Tj
29.715 0 Td
(She)Tj
-45.129 -1.125 Td
(also)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(found )Tj
(he had provided intentional falsifications of his financial history to t\
he Government during a background)Tj
T*
(investigation. )Tj
5.666 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that Applicant's history and actions warranted forma\
l findings against Applicant)Tj
-5.666 -1.125 Td
(under Criteria E, F, and J. )Tj
10.581 0 Td
(The Judge finally concluded it is not clearly consistent with the nation\
al interest to grant or)Tj
-10.581 -1.125 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse clearance decision.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 81.6836 38.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
Q
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 81.6836 37.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(M> \) )
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgwmwvfa=` /yQAQ1b[,ꂽwAbu?KְOޗ;3̙o~߽ nM=[PHTpm }}C;Tu h3ãD
P;@jHpst %ox"@Ѽ^r