%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:45-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:45-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:45-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0727.a1
uuid:d1302513-8fdb-43d6-a216-224982b6849b
uuid:2999651d-a48f-4134-9c13-fdb80ddac524
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0727.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0727.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 3, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0727)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.125 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.847 -2.125 Td
(Thomas M. Abbott, Esq.)Tj
-19.212 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision, dated March 16\
, 1998, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative J\
udge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge's factual findings are)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(supported by substantial record evidence; and \(2\) whether the Administ\
rative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
T*
(and contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 24, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(A hearing was held on February 26, 1998. )Tj
17.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
-17.107 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant o\
r continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
45.567 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.567 -1.125 Td
(case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from that favora\
ble decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's factual findings are supported by sub\
stantial record evidence)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 129 cm
0 0 m
466.348 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 494.3477 129.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative)Tj
-39.862 -1.125 Td
(Judge made the following findings: In September 1987, Applicant \(then a\
32-year-old lawyer\) purchased a company)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(engaged in defense contracting. )Tj
12.911 0 Td
(Prior to the purchase, the then-owner of the company:\(a\) received a mi\
staken double)Tj
-12.911 -1.125 Td
(payment from one of the military services in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the amount of $980,000 and converted that payment to the company's use;)Tj
T*
(and \(b\) improperly converted more than $1 million of the employee's pr\
ofit-sharing plan's funds. )Tj
38.934 0 Td
(Applicant discovered)Tj
-38.934 -1.125 Td
(these)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(wrongful conversions after he purchased the company. )Tj
24.464 0 Td
(Fearing that disclosure of these facts would jeopardize his)Tj
-24.464 -1.125 Td
(company's existence, Applicant: \(a\) misstated the status of the profit\
-sharing plan to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department of Labor in 1987;)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(_V$!\)V)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn