%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:43-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:42-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:43-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0726.a1
uuid:55b7b8c7-99b9-4f94-ba55-26fb2f217de9
uuid:554f60de-457f-4b0d-a805-b1c42b2c3aa3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0726.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0726.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:42 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 15, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ---------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 97-0726)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Joseph Testan issued a decision dated March 23, 199\
8, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 28, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR and requested an adjudication o\
f his case without a hearing. )Tj
41.489 0 Td
(A File of)Tj
-41.489 -1.125 Td
(Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared and a copy provided to Applicant\
. )Tj
30.602 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(submitted additional information)Tj
-30.602 -1.125 Td
(in response to the FORM.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case was assigned to Administrative Judge Joseph Testan. )Tj
25.272 0 Td
(The Judge subsequently issued a written decision in)Tj
-25.272 -1.125 Td
(which he concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national intere\
st to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(continue a security clearance for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adve\
rse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant does not explicitly challenge the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs of fact although his brief contains two)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(apparent denials that Applicant ever used drugs. )Tj
19.494 0 Td
(Applicant focuses his arguments on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his behavior since entering his)Tj
-19.494 -1.125 Td
(company's drug program. )Tj
(Applicant asserts that three of the mitigating conditions for drug invol\
vement apply in his)Tj
T*
(case, namely: mitigating condition 2 \(the drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(involvement was an isolated or infrequent event\), mitigating condition \
3)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(j"zO[}SL)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsgwA,X];64S)[,P),łua(ņ](g6{}{9 $ Apзm7?r
[ mn; w;63*n`l cFV_ Ȱ;\{G8>ѱcE)Vaa0(@?
H9 2x~hXld_[f<> 62q.@ƠqZ8
$.C#T} e@PEAВFeb7Uxw= z;qHiwl59E(Q,H|CUΏ7͇"e,$&jRb%nUcseÒ˖gXju7MYlݶ}]ݷ?C=DSϜ-s/\t
\nް<U-h`":GDDitZAgĂb/1D&|R7X7DwTWszMZLnJOGLPv(ŢJOgp`1$?rpj>p5FsuGUΡGC/zkd
M8px8t֜CGGGR}~%WtPxW
ЄjB45+|wy ܷ77777fodohog7OW~(hmm-
lm-GMlmm>nVkhmjEKng]%ϒc9hW,k,-,-,>`Scߌas"gby}#\~ϳ
_**H)ca*̄4X
`5A*sX px/a%l` C:D@DB>3pNix QpB!d@x"
R`0!102`8#GQ00X &x
+`Lr2<ǰxq._(E 2\et
XW*xq5hL\qnMqnm%L4܁;q=X ]q/Xn-Vx bxk'l-XkQXu0pz48<4AoAMxxa]܅{xVFi]^G)Aʤ~a:BG)Qq:AtNi>PH<]t.JP"<#Y٨n-Mw.ݣQ1= =zF+J3%rBSi%S
:i\ogpŝE
%?2cLde**37Ϊ0V/:Z̏bY֖c=>gXgօueXwHmvRK@KGRXMz"=$y