%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:40-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:39-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:40-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0707.a1
uuid:c6525bdd-a959-40fd-8c41-eb7e0407ef92
uuid:788bd1e7-2872-43cf-9c55-141023a89be8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0707.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0707.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 1, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 97-0707)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated May 14, 1998\
, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether some of \
the Administrative Judge's findings about)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's drug abuse are erroneous; \(2\) whether the Administrative J\
udge erred by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(finding Applicant provided false)Tj
T*
(information about his drug abuse history during a July 1997 interview; a\
nd \(3\) whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
T*
(unfavorable decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated December 9, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\), Criterion E \(Per\
sonal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Conduct\), and Criterion J)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 5, 1998. )Tj
15.607 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision, dated M\
ay 14,)Tj
-15.607 -1.125 Td
(1998. )Tj
(The Judge found Applicant had a history of marijuana and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(methamphetamine use, but concluded Applicant had)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(demonstrated sufficient evidence of reform to warrant formal findings fo\
r Applicant under Criterion H. )Tj
41.514 0 Td
(The Judge found)Tj
-41.514 -1.125 Td
(Applicant engaged in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(deliberate falsification of material facts about his drug abuse in conne\
ction with: \(1\) a)Tj
T*
(Questionnaire for National Security Positions \(October 1996\); \(2\) a \
written statement given to a Special Agent of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the)Tj
T*
(Defense Investigative Service \(DIS\) \(May 1997\); and \(3\) an intervi\
ew with a DIS Special Agent \(July 1997\). )Tj
43.877 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
-43.877 -1.125 Td
(also found Applicant stole U.S. Government property, valued at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(approximately $4,570, during the period December)Tj
T*
(1993-June 1994. )Tj
(The Judge concluded Applicant's falsifications and theft of government p\
roperty were not mitigated)Tj
T*
(and warranted formal findings)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(against Applicant under Criteria E and J. )Tj
28.936 0 Td
(The Judge finally concluded it is not clearly)Tj
-28.936 -1.125 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(L\(Udqѿ3Pm)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsAE,0ņb0<}D@
(P),ł..VPDTl(],Y>}{_rs3g} Ԁ8 emO܂CBfT@_ ͡bVbdFDP/ݰI J:<<$aƲ) z>.a<y|5rLhOBb])`I
oXӌG
c]]~I m_8"Hr-4GSDP
9L8ٻC`^|ӿt*b[v)~
@@.js~|9/RYL*swMbFUT٥k:uoS^ުQ&M5EV۴mާCNvi={3}ˀ70_CC`hhXxİ#F=&z1?L;iS~:-n 3fJLJN=g.e˖ÊVIXn1sMymwܵ{ެ}