%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:05-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:04-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:05-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0825.a1
uuid:2b186f96-a7a1-4e87-89de-d963f40686f5
uuid:e7e391f6-a42f-41cf-b0a7-135eaddb73fb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0825.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0825.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 7, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0825)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-2.929 -2.125 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.707 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.43 -2.125 Td
(Gene A. Leposki, Esq.)Tj
-19.629 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax issued a decision, dated August 5, 199\
8 in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. For the)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant raises three issues on appeal: whether the Administrative Judg\
e's findings of fact were supported by)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(substantial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(record evidence, whether the Administrative Judge properly applied the D\
irective, and whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law?)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) to Applicant on March 31, 1998.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR was based on Criterion G \(Alcohol Consumption\) and Criterion E \(P\
ersonal Conduct\). )Tj
38.855 0 Td
(A hearing was)Tj
-38.855 -1.125 Td
(conducted on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(June 23, 1998. )Tj
11.692 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision on August 5, 1998 in \
which he)Tj
-11.692 -1.125 Td
(concluded it was not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board on appeal from that unfavorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1.)Tj
( Whether the Administrative Judge's findings of fact were supported by s\
ubstantial record evidence?)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 25 141 cm
0 0 m
481.676 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 506.6758 141.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant)Tj
-40.89 -1.125 Td
(challenges the Administrative Judge's findings from seven passages in th\
e Judge's decision. )Tj
36.825 0 Td
(The board will analyze each)Tj
-36.825 -1.125 Td
(challenge separately.)Tj
T*
(Applicant alleges that the Judge erred when he wrote that Applicant "use\
d alcohol, at times to excess and to the point of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(intoxication, from approximately 1982 to the present, with occasional pe\
riods of abstinence." )Tj
37.537 0 Td
(There is substantial record)Tj
-37.537 -1.125 Td
(evidence in the form of documentary evidence and Applicant's testimony s\
upporting those findings. )Tj
40.17 0 Td
(Applicant gave)Tj
-40.17 -1.125 Td
(inconsistent statements about his alcohol consumption. )Tj
22.247 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge made plausible findings of fact based)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(ք?MV^iL%UN)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn