%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:52-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:52-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0752.a1
uuid:9448bdd9-5e07-489f-8fec-85a58914da5d
uuid:310b5596-a772-4ccf-8332-bef2dd751aaf
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0752.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0752.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:52 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 4, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0752)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.138 -2.125 Td
(Carol A. Marchant, Esq.,)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.916 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.125 -2.125 Td
(Donald Koblitz, Esq.)Tj
-19.935 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Au\
gust 14, 1998, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.013 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision in part and reverses it in)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(part.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated November 20, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\) and Criterion D \(\
Sexual Behavior\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR and indicated that he did not w\
ant a hearing in his case. )Tj
39.768 0 Td
(A File of Relevant)Tj
-39.768 -1.125 Td
(aterial \(FORM\) was prepared. )Tj
12.301 0 Td
(A copy of the FORM was provided to Applicant, who submitted a response t\
o the)Tj
-12.301 -1.125 Td
(FORM. )Tj
(The case was then assigned to the Hearing Office for determination.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision in which she conclude\
d it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(The case is now before the Board on Applicant's appeal)Tj
-25.295 -1.125 Td
(from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Applicant makes several arguments in support of )Tj
19.856 0 Td
(his challenge to the Administrative Judge's adverse decision: \(1\))Tj
-19.856 -1.125 Td
(Applicant was denied a fair and impartial proceeding; )Tj
21.77 0 Td
(\(2\) the record evidence does not support the Judge's finding that)Tj
-21.77 -1.125 Td
(Applicant deliberately concealed his extramarital affair; \(3\) the Gove\
rnment failed to meet its burden of proving that)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(1M QgO)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn