%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:04-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:03-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:04-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0821.a1
uuid:cb9b90b1-d3a2-44b2-a125-8e6029fce2cf
uuid:17eaeb94-378a-45ed-9468-06971616170e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0821.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0821.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 15, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0821)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.013 -2.125 Td
(William S. Fields, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.791 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.389 -2.125 Td
(Robert J. Hill Esq.)Tj
-20.448 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision dated May 22, 19\
98, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative J\
udge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) Whether\
the Administrative Judge erred in his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(application)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(of the Adjudicative Guidelines; and \(2\) Whether the Administrative Jud\
ge erred in concluding that)Tj
T*
(Applicant had rebutted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Government's case.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\), dated December 8,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1997. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criteria H \(drug involvement\), E \(personal condu\
ct\), and J \(criminal conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on February 17, 1998. )Tj
17.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a decision in which he)Tj
-17.107 -1.125 Td
(concluded that it is clearly consistent with national interest to grant \
or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
45.845 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.845 -1.125 Td
(case is now before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from that fa\
vorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.375 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 86.3535 156.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 86.3535 156 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 126.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred in his application of the Adjudic\
ative Guidelines)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 126 cm
0 0 m
428.877 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 456.877 126.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.74 -1.125 Td
(argues)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(that the Administrative Judge failed to explain his deviation from the e\
xpress language of the Personal Conduct)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Adjudicative Guidelines by finding Applicant's falsifications were mitig\
ated by a correction that was neither prompt nor)Tj
T*
(voluntary.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's history of illegal drug use spans more than twenty years \(1\
973-1996\). )Tj
32.868 0 Td
(In January 1997, Applicant signed a)Tj
-32.868 -1.125 Td
(security clearance form in which he falsely denied illegal drug use in t\
he past seven years and falsely denied drug use)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(6yY W2ƙ)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn