%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:59-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:58-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:59-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0783.a1
uuid:7ca46227-0e36-40f6-b4f4-f69b026bdfb9
uuid:39b71846-fdf8-40b9-888a-69f14e6663af
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[31 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0783.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0783.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:58 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 7, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0783)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.387 -2.125 Td
(Carol A. Marchant, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.165 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.998 -2.125 Td
(Robert Aaron Greenberg, Esq.)Tj
-18.061 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated April 14, \
1998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issues of whether the Administrative Jud\
ge was biased, made certain errors in his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(findings of fact and conclusions, and misapplied the Financial Considera\
tions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Adjudicative Guidelines such that remand)Tj
T*
(or reversal is warranted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated January 2, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR in which he indicated his desir\
e for a hearing before an administrative judge.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(A hearing was conducted on March 31, 1998. )Tj
18.495 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(subsequently issued a decision in which he)Tj
-18.495 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.375 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 86.3535 143.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 86.3535 142.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 113.25 Tm
(On appeal Applicant contends that \(1\) the Administrative Judge is bias\
ed; \(2\) the Administrative Judge made various)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(findings of fact that are not supported by the record evidence; \(3\) th\
e Judge erred by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(finding that a single debt)Tj
T*
(constituted a history of not meeting financial obligations within the me\
aning of Financial Considerations Disqualifying)Tj
T*
(Guideline 1; and \(4\) the Administrative Judge failed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adequately consider the "whole person" concept and did not give)Tj
T*
(sufficient weight to record evidence that mitigated Applicant's indebted\
ness.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(f%-斪ى?7)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn