%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:55-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:54-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:55-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0769.a1
uuid:c0f2c208-318e-461a-854b-911360301cbd
uuid:4fa2c8c1-4e68-41a3-a7be-98c59dfae92d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0769.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0769.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:55 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 9, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0769)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision, dated April 21,\
1998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issues of \(1\) whether the Administrati\
ve Judge made incorrect findings; and \(2\) whether)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance decision is arbitr\
ary,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated November 24, 1997 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR and requested an adjudication o\
f his case without a hearing. )Tj
41.489 0 Td
(A File of)Tj
-41.489 -1.125 Td
(Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared and a copy provided to Applicant\
. )Tj
30.602 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(did not submit a response to the)Tj
-30.602 -1.125 Td
(FORM.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case was assigned to Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber. )Tj
26.383 0 Td
(The Judge subsequently issued a written decision in)Tj
-26.383 -1.125 Td
(which he concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national intere\
st to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(continue a security clearance for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adve\
rse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant asserts on appeal that \(1\) the Administrative Judge erred by\
finding Applicant abused the drug Ritalin; \(2\) the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge erred by finding Applicant used marijuana "about five times a mont\
h;" and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(3\) Applicant has been drug-free for)Tj
T*
(one year, is more mature, and is leading a more responsible life. )Tj
25.853 0 Td
(The Board construes Applicant's first two assertions as)Tj
-25.853 -1.125 Td
(contending the Judge made incorrect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(findings, and Applicant's last assertion as contending that the Judge's \
decision was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(zzҔTdu)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw]wgwa,(64XCϘH(c(,ł.`ņbu?KְOޗ;3̙o~߽ `"}ݴś{ذi }CxCex8 Qqc{DNд3&ʼ:s57EGEK[2^/?#