%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:11-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:10-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:11-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0066.a2
uuid:3fbcac85-38b6-40a7-97a2-2a87d8c8731c
uuid:80407df8-1fbf-4e3b-8960-da47fadee734
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0066.a2)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0066.a2.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:11 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 9, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0066)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a remand decision, dated Sep\
tember 11, 1998, in which he concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a\
security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.013 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(The Board remands the case with the recommendation that the Director, De\
fense Office of Hearings and)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(Appeals assign the case to another Administrative Judge for further proc\
essing consistent with the rulings and)Tj
T*
(instructions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(set forth in this Decision and Remand Order.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6, dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge failed to comply with the Board's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(August 28, 1998 Decision and Remand Order; \(2\) whether the Administrat\
ive Judge based his decision on matters other)Tj
T*
(than the record evidence and applicable provisions of the Directive; and\
\(3\) whether Applicant has been deprived of his)Tj
T*
(right to a fair and impartial determination.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\), dated January 16,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1998. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on April 15, 1998. )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
-15.608 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(That adverse decision was appealed by Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On August 28, 1998, the Board issued a Decision and Remand Order \("Rema\
nd Order"\). )Tj
35.781 0 Td
(The Board concluded the)Tj
-35.781 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's April 15, 1998 decision was arbitrary, capricious\
, and contrary to law. )Tj
37.699 0 Td
(The Board remanded the)Tj
-37.699 -1.125 Td
(case to the Judge with instructions to issue a new decision after correc\
tion of the errors identified by the Board.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a Remand Decision, dated Se\
ptember 11, 1998. )Tj
38.131 0 Td
(The Judge again)Tj
-38.131 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
(ԪU?.՝)
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsAEbٝ݅Yk`]b0<}D@XPTb#*Kl "Ežbwc%KwA/wg3{ *A~Ӥs+Иi[1
+h#cE
bаԍ J mDzxVQ[p;*:v܋Ⱦ<hm6",GѡbP6Ȟ<> m1:YP=e1"b
[xks
@I\.BcT} @PEAА(nϫo{wՃqhi@'7 4M(H|C5Ώ67Eʊ BYILtHk*{TZzjש)z[5իߠaƟ4iڬoZiۮ_wܥk=zˀ_}og]
#"E
2tX1#Gqq'4q)qS?}̄YI̝<E,^trXr5ik7oظ6oٺmvٛo恬9z,ܓN9{ _(xvba+VyA pB?ayQ )Hi
}`q(sG+P1m֩[{TWJwWW~P&)P(OWJ>\?R?WBf`fH2bH7
Fceccucmbl`ld7#/w/
VTjZWV-T?uƫ luFݬT3,5GWϩ&?S'SS)ijxOM.fyy9.V?GGGgG7G`,?3);a+ySMxa.Qan,Hl&CYqX >0L-Ձ.N{x*z_ !XS*'
ZH}>Y9!oHse}b/A9$)Ə8C"LC844 7r:p]=JewO[_5_5J2%%e %%/^Tl}[{k{K3{c{#{{}ɮ~j EEmm$ `5uڼ=ݭ~ֶVV_kSkZZ͊'brr- K%[YY[X:[-F]cߌaс