%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:16-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:15-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:16-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0088.a1
uuid:18c69cc0-9929-436b-9f0c-9c1810995e12
uuid:8eaddca5-37ee-4469-aaec-edb4b028fa6c
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0088.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0088.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:16 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(July 20, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0088)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued a decision, dated May 15, 19\
98, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated January 26, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 26, 1998. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
-16.107 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Administrative Judge made findings about Applicant's history of drug\
abuse \(which included frequent marijuana)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(use during the period 1987-March 1996, frequent cocaine use during the p\
eriod May)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1995-March 1996, and a failed)Tj
T*
(drug treatment program in 1995\). )Tj
13.607 0 Td
(The Judge considered the favorable evidence submitted by Applicant conce\
rning)Tj
-13.607 -1.125 Td
(changes in his life and concluded that evidence was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not sufficient to overcome the negative implications of Applicant's)Tj
T*
(long history of regular drug abuse and his 1995 failed drug treatment.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings about h\
is drug abuse history. )Tj
38.063 0 Td
(However, Applicant)Tj
-38.063 -1.125 Td
(contends: \(a\) his drug use was due to youthful immaturity and aimlessn\
ess; \(b\) he has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(matured, changed his life, and put)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(b8jIe\r%)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw*evf
=` /yQAQ-TTbAPPł
uX%k\Ч}K{{7J A6nٮ[hxlX⌊~ >|d² ̨=B" jhZeJNP
~NtdXă% ʽ"xcσz$@+{0} ddžs|Ei<_?$,6rɽx@ʊ:"龯.@q[xK3
@I\*6F@J(*%(nBegGݗW)ݱր{:x
@Sg}>xp~|i>)+&e9;&1Qd
+UVݣZ5kծRj[~>mܤi-Zjݦm;>ةsݺe{~?z}_Hh=p!C
Qnjy &M8u)3g͞:w,\xRX|ʴU5gfer6nڼe;rwڽ'o*8|'N:}Ξ;pzvXye$jA)> E)f*:CX%$6{!t1Y#/utut:D^ϔjNTz+}ʏxeRW,SR/KS)_F1V1V5V32*Ɔ c1[v6
jEUP=:Hm1j&3*uEݭIzUo7u4u6MQ&l6s̹f8j8NRo;̤ `Klʠ"z*`GgĹbX!FW+4犧WBerD\W+SiBԏ8FB!#T5Mȡs9!4s_Os
ќdd~ wњs^/ïD5~:pJ,WPMwENs_`_p76Vf&
&7ȼжЖnK-۹Q6£&6kwk7ZjֶzXRl[Yne9bɷaFK7KgK'h1Xn7dny<W5XUTDUxV 1 V#!W%g/{ui*er)Ý\e߇hW2eu_L({yVK%ȀD*