%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:19-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:18-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:19-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0156.a1
uuid:0b7c242b-d3bb-4a81-940f-55df31c9c611
uuid:e7dcefac-d692-4bb9-bff9-4c1bc35704b6
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0156.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0156.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:19 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 12, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0156)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.761 -2.125 Td
(Peregreine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.539 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision, dated July 31, \
1998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(On February 26, 1998, the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on June 17, 1998. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision. )Tj
41.798 0 Td
(The Judge)Tj
-41.798 -1.125 Td
(found)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant had $86,400 in debts discharged in bankruptcy on March 13, 199\
1, and Applicant had debts in excess)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
($107,000 discharged in bankruptcy on May 15, 1998. )Tj
22.774 0 Td
(The Judge considered Applicant's history of financial)Tj
-22.774 -1.125 Td
(difficulties)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and concluded Applicant's history of financial irresponsibility had nega\
tive security implications that were)Tj
T*
(not overcome)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(by the favorable evidence presented by Applicant. )Tj
26.045 0 Td
(The Judge concluded it is not clearly consistent with)Tj
-26.045 -1.125 Td
(the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.419 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's factual findings\
about his history of financial difficulties.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Rather,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant contends that the Judge should not have made an adverse securi\
ty clearance decision because his)Tj
T*
(debts were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(discharged in bankruptcy and were thus "satisfied" and should no longer \
be considered against him.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(624/Xӹ)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE݅֠bCc1K>c" E,(*Q4F1R,XbA]^"]Uby,as@/97g3ww9:A_~뽯?1q YY 7MZy+@3<p?@4 GOgd ȅ|KTDhS|N
2zlX(* ѡq14kƄFG8 Rv 6f #cGĔvXq27AI\!@kTj| CPEAP([«Toր4JqTU?Qi@ T
$>+l}bPoTھV:u9oڰQ&MeV5oѲUOڴmӾoNt={ӷg"`A_o9pп;°Q#F=fl̸b8)n4mzgΚ:gi.Z˒˖VI_nCVvFڴymwܵ{O}<HcEO_tv}gr}M+Ƀ!O.P.S\ Ӭk*C T/,5ɺV:].Cp*JmQqQ*MO^SF+JQ)kMerP)TN+k}>Dԏҏm=իAkmb56F@kvVy*m3.'JQ&kv`1TL
8nnU\n(kd9=`9^#ɗs4XM&s