%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:28-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:28-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:28-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0349.a1
uuid:47936fec-0547-46fa-853a-c1096c613f6b
uuid:18af9235-5f83-4599-bd75-ee7473339432
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0349.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0349.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:28 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 3, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0349)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.666 -2.125 Td
(Albert S.C. Millar, Esq.)Tj
-19.393 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated November 5, 1\
998, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 8, 1998 to Applicant. )Tj
46.738 0 Td
(The)Tj
-46.738 -1.125 Td
(SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
T*
(A hearing was held on August 25, 1998. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a )Tj
35.939 0 Td
(written decision. )Tj
6.915 0 Td
(The)Tj
-42.854 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge found that Applicant had debts totaling more than $\
40,000 that became delinquent during 1991-)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1992. )Tj
(The Judge also found that Applicant had a period of unemployment for fiv\
e months during that time, and that)Tj
T*
(Applicant's unemployment contributed to his failure to pay those debts. \
)Tj
28.813 0 Td
(The Judge concluded Applicant's failure to try)Tj
-28.813 -1.125 Td
(to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(resolve his delinquent debts after he regained employment constituted ne\
glect of his financial obligations that covered)Tj
T*
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(period January 1992-August 1998. )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(The Judge finally concluded that, given the overall history of Applicant\
's)Tj
-15.608 -1.125 Td
(financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(problems, it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for)Tj
T*
(Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is now before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administ\
rative Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings about h\
is history of delinquent debts. )Tj
41.368 0 Td
(However,)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(c>,osu})
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn