%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:29-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:28-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:29-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0350.a1
uuid:4d54f103-8250-4959-b03f-24aba5e97c54
uuid:b5fad28d-ffb7-4f92-8395-c7d0952335f2
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0350.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0350.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:28 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 31, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0350)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey-Anderson issued a decision, dated Nov\
ember 30, 1998, in which she concluded it)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a\
security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.93 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.93 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 14, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR was based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\), Criterion E \(Persona\
l Conduct\) and Criterion J \(Criminal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on November 10, 1998. )Tj
17.718 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
)Tj
-17.718 -1.125 Td
(she concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to\
grant or continue a security clearance for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs about his history of drug abuse or his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsifications about that drug abuse. )Tj
14.496 0 Td
(However, Applicant contends: \(1\) he has been "set up as a fall guy" th\
rough false)Tj
-14.496 -1.125 Td
(allegations that he sold drugs at work; \(2\) he is "being persecuted fo\
r my actions I did 23 or 25 year[s] ago"; \(3\) he)Tj
T*
(knows)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
("that it was wrong to lie on my security papers"; \(4\) his past drug ab\
use was a mistake; \(5\) if he had more time,)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(he could)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(present more favorable letters from friends and coworkers on his behalf;\
)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 407.1953 77.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 407.1953 76.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 418.564 72.75 Tm
( and \(6\) he is trying to keep a job)Tj
-33.547 -1.125 Td
(and be a father)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and husband. )Tj
11.69 0 Td
(The Board construes these contentions as raising the issue of whether th\
e Administrative)Tj
-11.69 -1.125 Td
(Judge's adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law\
.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(*lLWH\)U#Ә)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{AP]k
ņk@^}D@E%(TKl EAAw]b˳d
}9s枹s ԁ M7'fnA!+j{QZtp#GDh0bpCjF*\3GO[9D^{$`?1<?|0OtFH