%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:16:57-04:00
2021-07-07T15:16:56-04:00
2021-07-07T15:16:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0424.a1
uuid:f33ec4a6-350a-4a57-958a-b45f9d88d7ab
uuid:d78022f0-85c2-4190-9a38-8cc6377e2fc3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[32 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0424.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0424.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:16:56 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 16, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0424)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.387 -2.125 Td
(Carol A. Marchant, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.165 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated January 20, \
1999, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative J\
udge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge misapplied Criminal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Conduct Mitigating Conditions; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judg\
e's favorable security clearance decision is)Tj
T*
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated June 25, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on October 21, 1998. )Tj
16.718 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
-16.718 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant o\
r continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge misapplied Criminal Conduct Mitigating \
Conditions)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 117 cm
0 0 m
419.279 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 447.2793 117.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel)Tj
-35.94 -1.125 Td
(contends)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge erred by applying Criminal Conduct Mitigating C\
onditions 1, 2 and 5. )Tj
42.411 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-42.411 -1.125 Td
(reasons that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(follow, the Board concludes Department Counsel's contention has merit.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Criminal Conduct Mitigating Condition 1)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 61.5 cm
0 0 m
199.998 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 215.998 62.25 Tm
(.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 218.998 66.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 218.998 66 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(2>m>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H| XTG^y
Ûx
1duEc<"*:("("(xψbH~%}]]{U u`}ݦK`pdPԪ^
`-xbڻ [)aQ#"h 0"br1)- @A!WOh>
uv
#c
v@'k ۏ#b|)`e" ޒG Ԩ$>Uq "HZR})(
T!vV@P|3GWCO x
@Dꯁg?8r~|M&>;!1Q4vjש[Ͼ~dž7iL"W7ؼ{V?hӶ]{:uҵwջO~|_A5ۡ}?, 09jtD䘱QOa⤘S~Ӵ3f<+vq/Xhq˖bk`7&%oڼŔmO߱s={8p0P#Gs/8qT3g/]̖7[ZMT0
0DNGh:ͧ+VmAb8W/.GK(h1megrCY+ʃ!P{'y'fRԅrtaYx/`Pd!*ڻPb8*J3MitPe)eFe[T^@c188t'^&i)ݔam*maicty3z[!ȟP,簈^_l'yBqX,ksi+]eKsYe~9_$_˯tEts
.9Bj8 JC!psCq&'giz- 6֙sUsS!o~#k_V
WTTTW*lyn]vֶ6OVUj0)7V(M*(R}rét\i ږzYYZ-],^OK[`ijql53߮e7瘳|uܼټf6f[9>a.;|s9WyU^^^eg/<^ǘHp#K_ϿR皹{*Mf&M멦첪.{-[a>jaj\ !fa܇9a&,XJ\ޗzH^Bla8C@!B3p
4<08ga<%pC C(y0
Fh0A DDV)0~`*dFx 1$d(
*p5+Q*\p=nD܈ZX0^k܄q0S1
6w.܍{
\{q6AuG