%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:04:31-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:31-04:00
2021-07-02T16:04:31-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0395.a1
uuid:1cd64346-e7eb-461c-b9ef-c10c555401aa
uuid:f3fe1137-9858-474d-89c5-be7a09b165c5
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0395.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0395.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:04:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 24, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ----------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0395)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.664 -2.125 Td
(Michael H. Leonard, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.442 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
1.6 -2.125 Td
(---------------)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-2.32 -2.125 Td
(Personal Representative)Tj
-19.338 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated January 11, 1\
999, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by finding that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant did not deliberately delete particular e-mail messages; and \(\
2\) whether the Administrative Judge's decision is)Tj
T*
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated June 17, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR was based on Criterion M \(Information Technology\) and Criterion D \
\(Sexual Behavior\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on October 19-20, 1998. )Tj
18.051 0 Td
(At the hearing, Department Counsel indicated that it would not be offeri\
ng)Tj
-18.051 -1.125 Td
(evidence in support of the SOR allegation under Criterion D \(due to una\
vailability of a key witness\), and that its case)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(against Applicant would be based solely on Criterion M.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he concluded it is clearly consistent with the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Department)Tj
-28.766 -1.125 Td
(Counsel's appeal from that favorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant did not\
deliberately delete particular e-mail)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 51 cm
0 0 m
527.15 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(messages)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 16 37.5 cm
0 0 m
45.322 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 61.3223 38.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(There is no dispute that a female government employee sent Applicant, a \
defense contractor employee, an e-)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(#! .۹\()
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\J@F{6*
&M/ΗO${ɜa'_m֛؍.M}&=Ԩ顋ټpm?!-y{9z}U4o^gKj5u>VkoGҵ=s}TOi7λrc9A]1iVOChAjfU,3EɴݾSVl1^|b[r^\=ك,@[-|^W`:H*OggO77O77O77Oa_xa ^؋S) ܄n@ @ Zk
P+-ڤh)hL8;C?8}0 d
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxÛxDF,WtMV#qc
BDE%#
x5x_-x3:Wh?OuwUu~i+,V!щQI&0 7zT!%@ˀYlҠv)> w0&eh-.&jm0iBKLN1PEGiϊOJIjybahTbL6c7AIF&;Cp x'Il,l/)Pn-vj