%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:16:57-04:00
2021-07-07T15:16:57-04:00
2021-07-07T15:16:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0435.a1
uuid:5fb3ee88-4b0f-4a8e-bacf-720111c98584
uuid:4c537cbd-5869-4ea3-b4d9-945f48efb3e9
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0435.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0435.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:16:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 16, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0435)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.414 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.192 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.597 -2.125 Td
(Robert L. Huskey, Esq.)Tj
-19.462 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated June 9, 1999,\
in which he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adverse decision is arbitrary,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(capricious, or contrary to law; and \(2\) whether Applicant can be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(granted a security clearance on a probationary basis.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(August 28, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\) and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 30, 1999. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(written decision in which he)Tj
-16.107 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's adverse decision is arbitrary, capric\
ious, or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 142.5 cm
0 0 m
456.68 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 484.6797 143.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative)Tj
-39.057 -1.125 Td
(Judge found Applicant: \(a\) had a history of financial difficulties; \(\
b\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(borrowed money \(totaling approximately $8980\))Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(from various coworkers and friends to try to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(deal with financial problems faced by her and her husband; \(c\) conceal\
ed)Tj
T*
(from her husband her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(borrowing money from others; \(d\) on three separate occasions, misappro\
priated money)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(totaling)Tj
T*
($140\) from a Boy Scout troop for which she served as treasurer to cover\
a shortfall in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(her personal bank account; \(e\))Tj
T*
(made restitution of the misappropriated money after she was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(confronted about it; and \(f\) was making efforts to improve)Tj
T*
(her financial situation. )Tj
9.219 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(does not challenge the Judge's findings. )Tj
20.287 0 Td
(Indeed, Applicant essentially concedes the)Tj
-29.506 -1.125 Td
(Judge had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a rational basis for his findings.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(q5ǩS.$V)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn