%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:06-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:05-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:06-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0479.a1
uuid:eea4966f-08a0-4611-ab34-c4dc18e80f9c
uuid:6f93af35-06cc-4e7f-9a91-d69a852145e2
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0479.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0479.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:06 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 11, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0479)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.054 -2.125 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.832 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued a decision dated Octo\
ber 29, 1998, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.013 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on Appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: Did the Administrative \
Judge abide by her own procedural rulings.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\), dated July 6, 1998. )Tj
41.601 0 Td
(The SOR was)Tj
-41.601 -1.125 Td
(based on Criterion G \(alcohol consumption\).)Tj
T*
(A hearing was held on October 16, 1998. )Tj
16.718 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
she)Tj
-16.718 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(case is now before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Did the Administrative Judge abide by her own administrative rulings?)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 156 cm
0 0 m
340.928 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 356.9277 156.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant asserts that the Administrative Judge)Tj
-28.411 -1.125 Td
(failed to abide by her own ruling at the hearing. )Tj
19.299 0 Td
(Specifically, he claims that the Administrative Judge said that she was)Tj
-19.299 -1.125 Td
(leaving the record open until November 1, 1998 but that she proceeded to\
issue her decision on October 29, 1998.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant asserts that not all of his documentary supporting material wa\
s considered as a result of the October issuance)Tj
T*
(of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Judge's decision. )Tj
(The Board concludes that Applicant's argument lacks merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge stated twice at the hearing that she would keep\
the record open until October 26 \(tr. pp. 67,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(76\). )Tj
(Nothing in the record supports Applicant's claim that the Judge said she\
would keep the record open until)Tj
T*
(November 1. )Tj
(Furthermore, it appears from the file that almost all of Applicant's pos\
t-hearing documentation was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(\r0-!?eOl)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{/*`a]kw4S)Ec`A`-"""*bwcas@/97gΜ3ww T
QӷM+%k+@ -ainЦE P#@|PHӚMk \~-*"4ڥZF
NoTL\>.he
r pQLh|GOXBc"[|@;|T#@ؑ[r{KS )dLl
Q-=)"*(
4(ΎߟG)ġݱր;fDgm YxU9?\42JK\+WZWj{㫚ԭWA5nҴY-[nӶwԹKnݿW={}?o0 8$GDs4X^'O>Sgϝpezbn+Vy~ ZDt
z|($Ih5W`q8S+ŗCz.v&V)oKU+?(=Jr^(OJ>\?B?G\j`H4$~1XXXXӨǠ*U7V}Նjs_V)j:K]V5SU3Ub
3E7l0O7o3#^Ctt;:8:9:K}7*` ȗhMZ*̕Mľb8C-ħ9D{z@K=W}$(ROѧr`6L1|90>p1sRTuGΡG!Cy=FsyƜ8<ގ֜CGGGR}mxu(\>$5!` ޝ,daNm-MMMvS/ /-%6{Fknf66ֳUhyl)-w-ʾY-Yt:fYonfld-fv)syreڥ%.n³ZxupqJ>tB{Z?H,퐖!hy\Og.eH=\,Nyp?{:p ?W0
`܃i0alu39DX ŎŐ9/= ^sx k`<
!R
P>DY8E
c(x %0`
1
0
~8
c0O0C:I0w\Q@B"8.?W?-JW*L(V+xp=n@3F܄qnmwN܅
\ę{p/t`VF7t*pnVŃհ:Cx`zlXkQZXQ0pnz48