%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:10-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:09-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:10-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0582.a1
uuid:f1cb31bc-9dfb-471b-ba3c-d831df24504e
uuid:202c6a20-06eb-4eee-a1a6-5709922143cc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
31 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 22 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0582.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0582.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:10 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
580.5 -0.75 l
581.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
580.5 -0.75 l
579.75 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 596.5002 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 12, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0582)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.971 -2.2 Td
(Arthur A. Elkins, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.749 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.152 -2.2 Td
(Mark Wilensky, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Kathryn M. Braeman issued a decision, dated June 29\
, 1999, in which she concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Board reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge's findings are)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(supported by substantial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(evidence; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge misapplied various Adju\
dicative Guidelines;)Tj
T*
(and \(3\) whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated August 25, 1998.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(based on Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduc\
t\), and Criterion J \(Criminal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on June 17, 1999. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
she)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(concluded it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's findings are supported by substantial\
evidence)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 106.5 cm
0 0 m
397.061 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 425.0605 107.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel contends)Tj
-34.088 -1.125 Td
(various findings by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge are not supported by substantial evidence. )Tj
35.298 0 Td
(Specifically, Department)Tj
-35.298 -1.125 Td
(Counsel argues the Judge erred by finding:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(a\) Applicant did not falsify her August 1997 written statement; \(b\)\
)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's omissions about her drug abuse were not material; \(c\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant successfully completed drug rehabilitation)Tj
T*
(programs prescribed and administered by credentialed medical professiona\
ls; and \(d\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant promptly reported a)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(February 1997 drug-related incident to her employer.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
(Yݠv c)
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn