%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:08-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:07-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:08-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0529.a1
uuid:55364c63-2b6c-4d78-8d00-51462ecbc4db
uuid:d0843784-4358-4f89-bfb0-88943357c6ce
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0529.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0529.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:07 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 15, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0529)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.193 -2.125 Td
(Melvin A. Howry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.971 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued a decision, dated Jan\
uary 29, 1999, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.013 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was denied due process because he was not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(given)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adequate notice of the allegations against him; \(2\) whether the Admini\
strative Judge erred by ignoring Applicant's)Tj
T*
(defenses; \(3\) whether Department Counsel failed to meet its burden of \
proving controverted facts; and \(4\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge erred by making an impermissible "political status \
determination.")Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated August 6, 1998 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated "I wish \
to have a decision WITHOUT a hearing." )Tj
46.527 0 Td
(A)Tj
-46.527 -1.125 Td
(File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared. )Tj
19.883 0 Td
(A copy of the FORM was provided to Applicant, who submitted a)Tj
-19.883 -1.125 Td
(response to the FORM. )Tj
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for determination\
.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
she concluded it is not clearly consistent with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Appl\
icant. )Tj
30.238 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's)Tj
-30.238 -1.125 Td
(appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. )Tj
(Whether Applicant was denied due process because he was not given adequa\
te notice of the allegations against him)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 63 cm
0 0 m
554.807 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 582.8066 63.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-47.234 -1.125 Td
(Applicant contends the allegations against him were obscure, lacked spec\
ificity, and deprived him of the opportunity to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(S[=M9)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg]Ek@^)bAQ1J`-u("((w,Y>}{_roΜgs `6}ݶ
)u )Q:7R"GE
h`iԸiad 9g