%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:16-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:15-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:16-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0614.a1
uuid:eddd2e69-c90f-4b3d-bcc9-55b34294ea77
uuid:8f6cd003-b55b-4334-be9c-1f4cc939853e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[34 0 R 35 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0614.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0614.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:15 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 12, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0614)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.125 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.781 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge )Tj
8.832 0 Td
(Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated January 14, 1999, in wh\
ich she concluded it is)Tj
-8.832 -1.125 Td
(not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
41.013 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether paragrap\
h 5 of the Prehearing Guidance was violated; and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricio\
us, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated September 3, 1998 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
-4.443 -2.125 Td
(A hearing was held on December 8, 1998. )Tj
17.106 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
)Tj
-17.106 -1.125 Td
(she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to gra\
nt or continue a security clearance for)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse decisio\
n.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-4.443 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 86.3535 170.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 86.3535 169.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 140.25 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether paragraph 5 of the Prehearing Guidance was violated)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 139.5 cm
0 0 m
299.209 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 327.209 140.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant submitted various documents with his)Tj
-25.934 -1.125 Td
(answer to the SOR. )Tj
(At the hearing, the Department Counsel asked that the documents be sever\
ed from Applicant's)Tj
T*
(answer and Applicant be given the opportunity to offer them as exhibits,\
subject to any objections made by Department)Tj
T*
(Counsel. )Tj
(The Judge granted Department Counsel's request and returned the document\
s to Applicant. )Tj
40.42 0 Td
(During the hearing,)Tj
-40.42 -1.125 Td
(Applicant offered most of those documents as exhibits on his behalf.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Applicant contends that paragraph 5 of the Prehearing Guidanc\
e for DOHA hearings \(Prehearing)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Guidance\))Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 65.9746 48.75 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 65.9746 48 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 77.3433 44.25 Tm
( )Tj
(was violated because: \(a\) Applicant was not present when the Administr\
ative Judge received Applicant's)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(SGW6Ǩ3/<')
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZņk/yXh,PA,XbA]@.{uQT%kЧ}K͙3̝w A`7ھm{b2 8n
4QScͽ. u, Q4Hk7|}jf*\"Cd<8t{FFMy1 ,dž=<~O +RxfLHTxhE 2Nhsk2j?z|xU9?>*&U9;&1N%kԬP۱N]'z]\4l]huIf[̫U6m۵бS.]}G^|~_: p?kwCahPp
9bQcF?a⏓&LӴ3f9.~ /X(y~Ybհf)R6nlHB[em߱s={e?s0P^#G?qT3gϕ/]r0nK^RE
`0XF@i&ͣ+Vāb8W'.O
ngw.דry