%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:33-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:32-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:33-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98-0810.a1
uuid:0e8f480a-2e17-44f2-9ef1-4bc7964b3720
uuid:db42e39d-986e-465e-a4bf-ce03c3ede519
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98-0810.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/98-0810.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:32 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 8, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 98-0810)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.664 -2.2 Td
(Michael H. Leonard, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.442 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1 -2.2 Td
(Milton H. Baxley II, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr. issued a decision, dated December\
28, 1999, in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Administ\
rative Judge erred by finding Applicant violated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(26 U.S.C. 7203 and that tax liens were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(entered against Applicant in 1998 for unpaid federal income taxes for ta\
x years)Tj
T*
(1994 and 1995; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by concludin\
g)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant demonstrated poor judgment by)Tj
T*
(not filing income tax returns and not paying federal income taxes; and \(\
3\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by)Tj
T*
(holding against Applicant the fact that he filed a petition for bankrupt\
cy in 1998.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated December 11, 1998 to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
39.688 0 Td
(A hearing)Tj
-44.132 -1.125 Td
(was held on April 22, 1999.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated December 28, 1\
999, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse security clearance decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether Administrative Judge erred by finding Applicant violated 26 U.S.\
C. 7203)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 91.5 cm
0 0 m
396.92 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 424.9199 92.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found)Tj
-34.077 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant willfully failed to file)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(federal income tax returns for tax years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 199\
7, and that)Tj
T*
(he did not intend to file federal income tax returns in the future. )Tj
25.714 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(contends the Judge's findings are in error. )Tj
21.091 0 Td
(In)Tj
-46.805 -1.125 Td
(support of that contention, Applicant argues: \(a\) 26 U.S.C. 7203 \(Sec\
tion 7203\) does not impose any duty to file a)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(federal income tax return or to pay federal income taxes; \(b\) there is\
no provision of Title 26 of the U.S. Code \(Title 26\))Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(/.7= )
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn