%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:37-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:37-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:37-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0018.a1
uuid:49613968-31cd-4ba1-83a5-8cf0fd0c5bde
uuid:b682b318-3462-460c-848a-f19e92e606d4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[32 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0018.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0018.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:37 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 6, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0018)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.664 -2.2 Td
(Michael H. Leonard, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.442 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision, dated August 9\
, 1999, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board remands the case to the Administrative Judge for further processin\
g)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(consistent with the rulings and instructions set forth in this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Decision and Remand Order.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues \(1\) whether \
the Administrative Judge erred by applying)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Sexual Behavior)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(itigating Condition 2 and Criminal Conduct Mitigating Conditions 1 and 5\
; and \(2\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated January 8, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(on Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\) and Criterion D \(Sexual Behavior\).\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated he did n\
ot wish a hearing. )Tj
37.02 0 Td
(A File of Relevant Material)Tj
-37.02 -1.125 Td
(\(FORM\) was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(prepared. )Tj
(A copy of the FORM was given to Applicant, who submitted a response to t\
he FORM.)Tj
T*
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for disposition. \
)Tj
28.883 0 Td
(The Judge issued a written decision, dated)Tj
-28.883 -1.125 Td
(August 9, 1999, in which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(he concluded it is clearly consistent with the national interest to gran\
t or continue a security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.65 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 68.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 67.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by applying Sexual Behavior Mitig\
ating Condition 2 and Criminal Conduct)Tj
ET
Q
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 37.5 cm
0 0 m
558.562 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(KR'HDDJ)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEET,]k
{b /y(*Q4*͂%X*v""*}*F