%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:37-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:36-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:37-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0012.a1
uuid:de3476d1-45f4-45a8-9fb3-20b10c1f8893
uuid:94d2515a-efc1-4032-9db5-938060b63a47
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0012.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0012.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:36 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 1, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0012)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.054 -2.2 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.832 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.458 -2.2 Td
(Bart J. Cook, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued a decision, dated June 30, 1\
999, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by not considering)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's response to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(File of Relevant Material; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's \
adverse security)Tj
T*
(clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated January 8, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(on Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR in which he indicated he did no\
t want a hearing. )Tj
36.825 0 Td
(A File of Relevant Material)Tj
-36.825 -1.125 Td
(\(FORM\) was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(prepared. )Tj
(A copy of the FORM was given to Applicant, who submitted a response date\
d June 4, 1999.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated June 30, 1999,\
in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by not considering Applicant's re\
sponse to the File of Relevant Material)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 81 cm
0 0 m
541.014 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 569.0137 81.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-46.084 -1.125 Td
(Applicant contends the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge did not consider his June 4, 1999 response to the F\
ORM. )Tj
41.328 0 Td
(In support of this)Tj
-41.328 -1.125 Td
(contention, Applicant cites to his June 4,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1999 response )Tj
22.524 0 Td
(when challenging some of the Judge's factual findings. )Tj
22.147 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.671 -1.125 Td
(reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant has failed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to demonstrate the Judge erred.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(0xd\)\r*)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn