%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:38-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:38-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:38-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0018.a2
uuid:57d11885-9e8f-442d-aca6-874af7d62f87
uuid:5f9e73e4-2dad-46f0-b6ce-4cf32e442e8f
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 21 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
31 0 obj
[38 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0018.a2)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0018.a2.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:38 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 11, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0018)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.664 -2.2 Td
(Michael H. Leonard , Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.442 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 226.6914 419.25 Tm
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 418.5 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 393.75 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a remand decision, dated D\
ecember 20, 1999, in which he concluded it)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(is clearly consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
40.402 0 Td
(Department)Tj
-40.402 -1.125 Td
(Counsel appealed. )Tj
7.581 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's remand decision.)Tj
-7.581 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge abused his discretion)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(by refusing to consider a brief on remand)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(proffered by Department Counsel; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge \
erred)Tj
T*
(by applying Sexual Behavior Mitigating Condition 2; \(3\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge erred by applying )Tj
44.131 0 Td
(Criminal)Tj
-44.131 -1.125 Td
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 1; \(4\) whether the Administrative Judge e\
rred by applying Criminal Conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(itigating)Tj
T*
(Condition 5; )Tj
5.278 0 Td
(and \(5\) whether the Administrative Judge's overall decision was arbitr\
ary, capricious and contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.754 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated January 8, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Criterion D \(Sexual Behavior\). )Tj
36.521 0 Td
(The SOR alleged that)Tj
-36.521 -1.125 Td
(Applicant engaged in acts of sexual molestation with several female vict\
ims \(who)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(were minors\) at various times in)Tj
T*
(1997. )Tj
(It also alleged that Applicant pled guilty to one count of lewdness invo\
lving a child in a state court, was placed on)Tj
T*
(probation, violated his probation by committing an additional act of sex\
ual molestation and had his probation revoked)Tj
T*
(and subsequently reinstated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant elected to have the case determined on a written record in lie\
u of a hearing. )Tj
34.513 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued)Tj
-34.513 -1.125 Td
(a written decision, dated August 9,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1999, in which he concluded it is clearly consistent with the national i\
nterest to grant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
18.769 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(appealed the favorable decision.)Tj
-18.769 -2.125 Td
(On December 6, 1999, the Board issued its Appeal Board Decision and Rema\
nd Order \(hereinafter "Remand Order"\). )Tj
47.413 0 Td
(In)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 537.0801 39.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
Q
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 537.0801 39 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
(\r#%վѷ)
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw
evfwQ%O1bE%X0"X{GAEžuX%k\Ч}K{{7JA4i<-$,:4f麊uKؘX}w; 1{Lд5>ҴvZ %o`ݲ uGz8>c=6a0dp@?@ KRx~xhtDЙLJcYuRnj)j5_Y .́(@$qZ("(
4( ~0?RM;߉J{bfx
@Āg}>T
kq|(RVLrwMbF+.*V\խ{5<rI