%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:46-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:45-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:46-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0068.a1
uuid:71be24cc-4ba3-4763-a3bf-e05cd7e32176
uuid:17d371ae-b0ea-477b-888c-8952cab73bdc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0068.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0068.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 30, 1999)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0068)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision, dated July 16, \
1999, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was denied a fair hearing; \(2\) whether Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(was prejudiced by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the timing of the issuance of the Administrative Judge's decision; \(3\)\
whether the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge erred by failing to consider)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(information submitted by Applicant; \(4\) whether the Administrative Jud\
ge erred by)Tj
T*
(finding Applicant had engaged in a felony; \(5\) whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge erred by finding Applicant used)Tj
T*
(alcohol to excess for 20 years; \(6\) whether the Administrative Judge's\
adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision is arbitrary and capricious)Tj
T*
(because there was no showing that Applicant is a security risk; and \(7\)\
whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adverse)Tj
T*
(decision is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated February 3, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(on Criterion G \(Alcohol Consumption\) and Criterion J \(Criminal Conduc\
t\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on April 20, 1999. )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge subsequently issued a written decision in which\
he)Tj
-15.608 -1.125 Td
(concluded it is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant's appeal from the Administrative Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether Applicant was denied a fair hearing)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 78 cm
0 0 m
215.238 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 243.2383 78.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant contends he was denied a fair hearing. )Tj
20.243 0 Td
(In support of this)Tj
-39.179 -1.125 Td
(contention, Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(argues: \(a\) it is not possible to obtain legal representation when dea\
ling with DOHA; \(b\) DOHA)Tj
T*
(operates under "laws, rulings, and jargon that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(are not accessible, to the general public"; \(c\) Applicant felt his hea\
ring)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(was a "kangaroo court," a "horror show," and "a complete farce." )Tj
26.328 0 Td
(Applicant also asserts, without elaboration or)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(^&d)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgwm݅Yk`3&RDEc`X{GA;*}*,ϒ5l.%==sw @%oxb1-84:$fuS
t jЦEP;@rPԸ
<%2<$% ZGT
q"G>|6!082 hEƸE<_?,$:|c?ctˮ:l?fdxLaZ' ^B KEhjE!TCQE
y2]nz0NZ>ZS^e_|P DV]*TTkjnktUNz:Eo0zz
6j3͚i٪uw]v/{~ի٧}аA6