%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:53-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:53-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:53-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0144.a1
uuid:7a6c9c67-c1e6-4e0b-bd24-a7a6adba67f8
uuid:3db95d5f-89db-42a6-b551-91f05874b237
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:53 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 11, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0144)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.971 -2.2 Td
(Arthur A. Elkins, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.749 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Kathryn M. Braeman issued a decision, dated August \
26, 1999, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by finding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant did not intend to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(falsify a security questionnaire in June 1998 when he omitted his crimin\
al record; \(2\))Tj
T*
(whether the Administrative Judge erred in her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(application of the Adjudicative Guidelines; and \(3\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's favorable security clearance decision should be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reversed.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated March 3, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(on Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\) and Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\)\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on July 9, 1999. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated August 26, 199\
9, in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(which she concluded it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for)Tj
T*
(Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding Applicant did not inte\
nd to falsify a security questionnaire in June)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 79.5 cm
0 0 m
565.523 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 66.75 Tm
(1998 when he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(omitted his criminal record)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 66 cm
0 0 m
200.613 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 216.6133 66.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(There is no dispute that Applicant executed a security questionnaire in \
June)Tj
-16.718 -1.125 Td
(1998, and that when doing so he did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not disclose a 1991 felony charge and a 1988 driving while intoxicated \(\
DWI\))Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(charge. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found that Applicant did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(intend to falsify the security questionnaire because: \(a\))Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(TZ\)O#{)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgņew]4XcϘH(#P),ł.bEElbb˳d
}9s枹s ԁX m7O"#^ &Gik@9*b@) vGO
5eE|?;,$0~ 'zC8aQ|C%||P +Gё>T ,kF, RfIQ6 #'DuZq"} @I\)zBTjB EAP(݀6oΫToՂت~o (NH|W":$&ک$}usѩa#gM6ӸZ]14oѲU6xmgNtֽW^zӷ_
|>_!C5}?? F
=flxĸ&Na~ӌؙ?Ϛ='!1)yR.Z䗥˖X VY.-}ƌ̬MyKmwܵ{O}_hhjk56O冲F/O.H.M\
Nh+u#tqd/777@}S@ڊ⤸(wQRX%^IP*ufe)EJrF3x
} Caa|g>Fq1ۘcm
yV;[f{k՜TMG(sOTJX]'b8O\(5E*WpuMu}&Zy+k3(m6s .^C}Ρ= }p
_p!EIU>p(.s?p1