%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:52-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:51-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0123.a1
uuid:3b36a2d4-bf62-45db-874d-134966487224
uuid:f9ff8d5f-0763-4e15-8e66-268ba73bfbbd
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0123.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0123.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:52 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
580.5 -0.75 l
581.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
580.5 -0.75 l
579.75 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 596.5002 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 11, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0123)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Claude R. Heiny issued a decision, dated October 4,\
1999, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(knowingly and willfully falsified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(material facts about his criminal record and his financial difficulties;\
and \(2\) whether)Tj
T*
(the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated February 24,)Tj
T*
(1999. )Tj
(The SOR was based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\
\), and Criterion J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated he wante\
d to have a decision made without a hearing.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(A File of Relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(aterial \(FORM\) was prepared. )Tj
19.966 0 Td
(A copy of the FORM was given to Applicant, who submitted a)Tj
-19.966 -1.125 Td
(response to it. )Tj
5.833 0 Td
(The case was then assigned to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge for disposition.)Tj
-5.833 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision in which he concluded\
it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
T*
(interest to grant or continue)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from)Tj
-25.295 -1.125 Td
(that adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.65 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 93.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 93 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 63.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding Applicant knowingly an\
d willfully falsified material facts about)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 63 cm
0 0 m
554.514 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 50.25 Tm
(his criminal record and his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(financial difficulties)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 49.5 cm
0 0 m
227.924 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 243.9238 50.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found that Applicant knowingly and)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(;_aZ/)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZņk@^)[b@X],(]*F