%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:59-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:59-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:59-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0212.a1
uuid:7b32e354-29db-49eb-93dc-5106db238724
uuid:b537a7a0-6114-417e-9e4a-80556a17feff
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0212.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0212.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:59 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 18, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0212)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued a decision, dated September \
20, 1999, in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated March 26, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\), Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\), and \
Criterion E \(Personal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR in which she indicated she want\
ed a decision made in her case without a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(A File of Relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(aterial \(FORM\) was prepared, and a copy of the FORM was given to Appli\
cant. )Tj
39.935 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-43.434 -1.125 Td
(submitted additional information in response to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(FORM. )Tj
24.025 0 Td
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for)Tj
-24.025 -1.125 Td
(disposition. )Tj
(The Judge issued a written decision, dated September 20, 1999. )Tj
30.578 0 Td
(The Judge entered formal findings in favor)Tj
-30.578 -1.125 Td
(of Applicant under Criterion H, but formal findings against her under Cr\
iterion E and Criterion J, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is not)Tj
T*
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.419 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings that: \(\
a\) Applicant had a series of arrests in 1994)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(shoplifting\), January 1995)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(theft\), March 1995 \(grand theft\), and June 1995 \(forgery and resis\
ting an officer without)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(violence\); \(b\) Applicant was found guilty of the grand)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(theft charge and sentenced to 18 months probation and ordered to)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(a[ICמs>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw
vvf]43&RDE%KDE`-u{oQQluc,asA/wg3{ $ IO"㗤Wn "F%+-͈342V
رѦ4 %o
t<@^joHg7&.a><. hmb BwQ\x XC: ?ld=@QE-iy<9 $.1>R!Z hI#2P Uy7 zg8k
` 4E*H|WX}bPo5ZIvTJjn=jUN]o7}|US
6j_͚h٪uti]v{~7_}Ca@DdTA
?|ȄF3v0q䟧$N6=iYM7_-^t,_rU5kי32ӆ6oٺmvٻo܃9z
N9[]x2_Xٮ6U-h`:WH>Li"ͤY+VMb8])ŗރx>Mԭ=Sj(JwGSW~Rv(JbQ(/2}~~~>W0ŐlŐac5cuc
cmbl`ld4|W
VV]UKjNR$u@]nPl5_-PϪ=S)a6
1
k<ӯ`ndmvz.q:g&U