%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:17:57-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:56-04:00
2021-07-07T15:17:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0200.a1
uuid:1e01e16d-0f89-4cf9-92bb-38669852f61e
uuid:53bc20af-588a-4933-b813-09002b0bbe5d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[28 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0200.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0200.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:17:56 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 30, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0200)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision dated December \
2, 1999, in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to grant a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
34.709 0 Td
(Applicant appealed for the)Tj
-34.709 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative )Tj
24.771 0 Td
(Judge's decision.)Tj
-24.771 -2.125 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992 as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 17, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(The SOR was based on Criterion J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\))Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 279.2969 251.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 279.2969 250.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 293.103 246.75 Tm
( and Criterion F \(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
17.747 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-40.839 -1.125 Td
(requested that the case be decided without a hearing. )Tj
21.325 0 Td
(On December 2, 1999 the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge issued a decision)Tj
-21.325 -1.125 Td
(in which he concluded that it is not clearly consistent with the nationa\
l interest to grant or continue a security clearance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(for Applicant. )Tj
5.859 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.56 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricious or \
contrary to law)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 154.5 cm
0 0 m
414.035 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 442.0352 155.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant notes that he)Tj
-35.503 -1.125 Td
(admitted to the essential facts under Criterion)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(F, that he has now filed the tax returns from past years, that any refun\
ds)Tj
T*
(were credited to his balance and that he intends to pay his remaining ta\
x indebtedness. )Tj
34.767 0 Td
(Applicant also notes that without)Tj
-34.767 -1.125 Td
(his clearance he may lose his job and be unable to pay his debts. )Tj
25.965 0 Td
(Applicant cites a previous statement in the record as)Tj
-25.965 -1.125 Td
(explanation for his situation. )Tj
11.692 0 Td
(He also believe his honesty and dedication to his employer prove his loy\
alty and)Tj
-11.692 -1.125 Td
(trustworthiness. )Tj
(The Board construes Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(arguments as presenting the issue of whether the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant does not challenge any of the Administrative Judge's findings \
of fact. )Tj
32.145 0 Td
(Indeed he points out that he admitted)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
( ܛ\(emWCN)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZ
ϘHJ*ł%XPTAA{uQ,ϒ%l%̙{;? Pb m9XȟDGH } LX}+@5"r@`/@ v#L o Їi+4u98^1/e̸`O"c(`y*
[~wp2M94HY5!,bE*'ط"?!DUb[hJT(*E5[`1Cy*ЂV!mUZ<0
ʼn~U_|p
pP TD;QCmG:.u빺oа<}&M5owV۴mCNt={ӷ|7+ͷ4_CaxHhXF;.j?N3eOӦϘ;s&$&%ϛ`aʢKl`RoH۸i!=#smݖ}]ݷC=wDbw/0אeom {V;_i٪L VN"/
9,4*7́!b(%b;pc+=##&kd_9@9V'W4hM&s