%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:02-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:01-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:02-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0254.a1
uuid:015e1997-a345-4fe2-8e06-ad0c7558b5ba
uuid:ff2dc424-39e8-4090-ad70-657c2ed6443f
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[32 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0254.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0254.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 16, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0254)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.609 -2.2 Td
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr., issued a decision, dated Septemb\
er 9, 1999, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge imposed an improper)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(burden of proof on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department Counsel; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's decisio\
n with respect to Criterion C)Tj
T*
(was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated May 4, 1999. )Tj
46.738 0 Td
(The)Tj
-46.738 -1.125 Td
(SOR was based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion B \(Foreign Influence\) and Criterion C \(Foreign Preference\)\
. )Tj
35.879 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
-35.879 -1.125 Td
(issued a written decision, dated September)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(9, 1999, in which he concluded it is clearly consistent with the nationa\
l)Tj
T*
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.65 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 146.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 145.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 116.25 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge imposed an improper burden of proof on \
Department Counsel)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 115.5 cm
0 0 m
465.217 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 493.2168 116.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative)Tj
-39.768 -1.125 Td
(Judge found: \(a\) in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(January 1997, Applicant applied for citizenship in a foreign country \(F\
C\) based on his ancestry; \(b\))Tj
T*
(Applicant became an FC citizen in July)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1997; \(c\) Applicant obtained an FC passport in August 1997; and \(d\) \
Applicant)Tj
T*
(used the FC passport once in approximately March 1998)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(when entering a neighboring country from FC. )Tj
41.853 0 Td
(The)Tj
-41.853 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge found Applicant exercised dual citizenship by apply\
ing for and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(obtaining FC citizenship and)Tj
T*
(obtaining and using an FC passport, but concluded that the government fa\
iled to demonstrate Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conduct)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
( fS*L@)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H| Tn"
.3=
!yIYDE%Ƹ\u wQDQDPDEq(.%c]Чw{Nݺշw m7'fnA!Q+Sz71:kt £GD
h8"rr!%#@aSWMh>lه8Q1%rlH0GQ~"kG
۾ )=z섘jGG.Xy 6O$q mP~BAM*Q>;WhߊZ} s_PW5,GΏ 7"5&$&ԒƦNz886lܸIf.VwsW[lպ'm۵ٱW.]uS^3|7K7!
aA0<$4,|DQ#ƌ7~B̏'NԟM1Y̍8EI,]+W5kOސqfcZzں-svٻ/k99w,xAቓEO9[Η^x2\f2_/+VI
jP4a?M@iۊ@q .ŇQ.]TNw]Tn(`yp]s҇rd%"
0(!