%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:01-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:01-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0228.a1
uuid:92c55eb1-602b-41ff-b689-e3eabfe17dad
uuid:4b1a7b22-738d-4ae6-9cda-e21152bece08
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 21 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0228.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0228.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 12, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0228)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.971 -2.2 Td
(Arthur A. Elkins, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.749 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.11 -2.2 Td
(Emile J. Henault, Jr., Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated August 3, 200\
0, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(below, the Board reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge's findings are)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(supported by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(substantial record evidence; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge'\
s decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
T*
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 28,)Tj
T*
(1999. )Tj
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(SOR was based on Guideline M \(Misuse of Information Technology\) and Gu\
ideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on May 25, 2000. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision dated August 3, 2000 \
in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(which he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluded it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant o\
r continue a security clearance for)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Judge's favorab\
le security clearance)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's findings are supported by substantial\
record evidence)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 118.5 cm
0 0 m
430.705 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 458.7051 119.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel's)Tj
-36.892 -1.125 Td
(appeal brief)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(pp. 10-14\) quotes extensive passages from the Administrative Judge's \
decision and then asserts without)Tj
T*
(elaboration or supporting)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(argumentation that "[t]he record evidence does not support the Administr\
ative Judge's findings)Tj
T*
(of fact." )Tj
(Department Counsel's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(cursory assertion of factual error lacks specificity. )Tj
32.827 0 Td
(The Board will consider only those)Tj
-32.827 -1.125 Td
(claims of factual error that Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Counsel raises with specificity. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
28.574 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 99-0295 \(October 20, 2000\))Tj
-28.574 -1.125 Td
(at pp. 3-4 \(explaining why blanket assertions of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(factual error are inadequate\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
(.ކ?7Fg)
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0l/GiI6pl%54Q)]XHg!nK_yhqr>u9^kn;Se庾>g{nƢvyCQm)ݷn8trw6{W1Mnkţތ?st{u6O[v%eڡicn)®_Z1uñ}orQWXX`,d+YB~1^fؓ=~9
3zd} 0]%o P'0
tp:YAVdaADXS暏G L~_/PJêg8YpV:+
gYpV:+61>; -bl7s>ů?bFg)_ v{
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=`CE{a-;{L%1&"[bDE`/`;rW1'&;O[o%g=sYs
P`Z͜ir!-<26"nu
WGoX?(
zN֫#(x80&YJ\q0Pճwd;=32~1(4\RdWDlToݾ]6@_ [Ua!tPy0ףd9j-T%D+%HUU,h^S(WZX̒ZۚjyZigSPmM>7Ix[$,TOM*THbK)UڷLr+- bU~\zjש[~B7i-ZjqO>mۇ~/|Ỏ),<#DEwֽG^
C
ȄQ$4~IɓL6}Y`R.Zd+Vk֮[a[m۾c{Gf;~,>sqqy
ؔ|W=aX<8ED{Qǩ_w~2/j2VF;jl6g
xaZXX&ZZ-O#I6a+f+a+e+g3llUlml %;jT¦c1+fUb43oN5͍sy