%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:10-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:09-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:10-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0298.a1
uuid:13ec22c7-533a-42de-8ec2-1cc047808c99
uuid:4e25b94d-d63c-425e-834c-7f3a59fb4c33
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0298.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0298.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:10 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 13, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0298)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Joseph Testan issued a decision, dated December 20,\
1999, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: whether the Administrat\
ive Judge erred by finding that Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsified a security questionnaire in July 1998)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(by not listing a June 1996 arrest for shoplifting.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated July 28, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Criterion D)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Sexual Behavior\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\), and Criterion J \(\
Criminal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\). )Tj
(A hearing was held on November 17, 1999. )Tj
21.94 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(issued a written decision, dated)Tj
-21.94 -1.125 Td
(December 20, 1999, in which he concluded it is not clearly consistent wi\
th the national interest to grant or continue a)Tj
T*
(security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adve\
rse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.121 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge found: \(a\) Applicant is a 47-year-old man; \(\
b\) Applicant was arrested for shoplifting in June)Tj
T*
(1996 after he tried to steal a pair of boots)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(from a department store; \(c\) Applicant was convicted of shoplifting, f\
ined, and)Tj
T*
(placed on two years probation; \(d\) Applicant was arrested and charged \
with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(indecent exposure in January 1997 after he)Tj
T*
(had urinated in public; \(e\) Applicant later pleaded guilty to the inde\
cent exposure charge, was sentenced to five days)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(in)Tj
T*
(jail \(suspended\), placed on two years probation, and ordered to get co\
unseling; \(f\) Applicant completed the required)Tj
T*
(counseling and is no longer on probation;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and \(g\) Applicant intentionally concealed his )Tj
35.13 0 Td
(1996 arrest and conviction for)Tj
-35.13 -1.125 Td
(shoplifting when he completed and executed a security questionnaire in J\
uly 1998.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs about the 1996 shoplifting incident or the)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(1997 indecent exposure incident. )Tj
13.468 0 Td
(However, Applicant contends he did not falsify the security questionnair\
e in July)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
("ml\n\( o>)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsgwA,X]E5h /y+%(ł%XP]](g6{}{9
A`Zmy ?rZR- m0^_iN v mjDԐAa 4aZ@[=HY>X^P{Sy34r|<. hg9:4
Ǒ!Q}(`i2
oo(5zxǑ ƆG]h@x @G8"H
4Ad(Z҈L&: z R];Keր 3^Pاk Yx9?:4|JKU\W^f-uy)zG5oаQ&4mּEV۴mCN|[={}y/2 |?׀o~1d#FF5f?L=iS~:-fϱ3fΚ8gI.Z˒˖VI^.eԴMymwܵ{}d