%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:06-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:05-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:06-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0288.a1
uuid:3bd8669e-cab2-42ec-89ff-b15371e02f41
uuid:a03baacf-87c7-4812-9ba1-214b68637b72
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0288.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0288.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:06 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 18, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0288)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Jerome H. Silber issued a decision, dated April 26,\
2000, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by relying on the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evaluation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(and diagnosis of Applicant by a Department of Defense psychiatric consul\
tant; and \(2\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(erred by not giving more weight to Applicant's current employment histor\
y and current character)Tj
T*
(references.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 25, 1999 to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline I \(Emotional, Mental, and Personality Di\
sorders\) and Guideline J)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 30, 2000. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(At the hearing, Department Counsel presented the testimony of a Departme\
nt of)Tj
-16.107 -1.125 Td
(Defense psychiatric consultant, and other evidence, in support of its co\
ntention that Applicant suffers from an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(emotional,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(mental, or personality disorder that raises security concerns because it\
causes a significant deficit in)Tj
T*
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(functioning.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated April 26, 2000\
, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse security clearance decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by relying on the evaluation and \
diagnosis of Applicant by a Department of)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 28 39 cm
0 0 m
558.17 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(=T~Uٖ%S!a?B)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTϹg.{
ݻp,E5h /yD`X]*}WQT%k }|̙3s:
~_i|{@Px`ʔڝ akH]5w8ZT# 4J0rPcrz23Bl")/TGF=
BֱaTX?pH +xn\`xHŵ? EY iT~Đ⎋UoDlAW; T NnB*oƳToсtUo1Sǃހ (FX6(gΏϐڽORLcMbJRת]n=N
6jܤF+7wجyZѦm:vܥk^=z~ݫw/|?o}p@:2l1cǍ0qRDMf̌s9s'_pQ%K|Uau6$lܴٔnؾc{ `G+8~ӅgΞ+/^|]7[nUtPa/MOiۈEq/.
hQ)Mvv@Ay