%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:17-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:16-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:17-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0393.a1
uuid:7e20563b-edbd-43d0-9719-86f28a03c2f3
uuid:68c82933-0ff4-424f-9350-10f59fa38469
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0393.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0393.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:17 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 25, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0393)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision, dated October \
19, 1999 in which he concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(for the reasons set forth below, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\) dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse decision is arbitrary, capricious or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated June 11, 1999 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was base on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Criterion G \(Alcohol Consumption\) and Criterion F \(Financial Consider\
ations\). )Tj
41.189 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.189 -1.125 Td
(requested a hearing which was held on September)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(22, 1999. )Tj
24.271 0 Td
(On October 19, 1999, the Administrative Judge issued his)Tj
-24.271 -1.375 Td
(decision which included formal findings for Applicant under Criterion)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(F)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 363.5898 224.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 363.5898 223.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 377.396 219.75 Tm
( but formal findings against Applicant under)Tj
-30.116 -1.125 Td
(Criterion G.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.419 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's decision below noted that Applicant was "an a\
dmitted alcoholic." )Tj
37.626 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
-37.626 -1.125 Td
(found that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant consumed alcohol at times to excess and to the point of intoxi\
cation from 1978 to 1989 and again)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(from 1997 to January 3, 1999. )Tj
12.332 0 Td
(During Applicant's periods of excessive alcoholic consumption he engaged\
in a violent)Tj
-12.332 -1.125 Td
(altercation and had three documented arrests for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(driving under the influence. The Administrative Judge concluded that)Tj
T*
(given Applicant's history and his relatively short recent history of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(abstinence it was premature to grant Applicant a)Tj
T*
(clearance.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(uN+ 0`R0)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{AP]k
k@^k@E`-u("("(6eWQ,ϒ%l%̙{;? PfA-ۼks?1s
ZR z8l^W G:5